Re: Two Articles about What Brits Know (or Don't)...

On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:28 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Paul Dormer) wrote:

>In article <q5dhq3p7rnsp6nmedss3i3cop137viu1tf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>fair****tfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (mike weber) wrote:
>
>> 
>> However what i (and apparently Paul) saw looked like:
>> 
>> >commercial art that sells. Besides, with a minor exception for
>> >evolution
>> >you never heard a parent complain about their kids learning science,
>> >there
>
>Except that I didn't see it.  :-)  Oh, it was before my eyes so
>presumably went down my optic nerves, but by the time it got to my
>brain, I read "Besides, science and technology are more economically
>useful than art unless its commercial art that sells. Besides, you
>never heard a parent complain about their kids learning science."

That's what i meant - the eye just wants to slide past that orphan
"evolution"