Re: >^..^< The cats on Candlemas 2008

David Friedman <ddfr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>  archmage@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Nate Edel) wrote:
> > Accepting for the sake of argument a hypothetical Christian God who
DID give
> > everyone life, how is it anything but an unsolicited gift, and as
such,
> > without obligation?  Or alternatively, wouldn't the only obligation
be, if
> > you disliked the preconditions, to return it to the sender?
>
> There's a Millay poem on this subject. She's on God's side.

Any recollections as to the title or how to track it down?

I'm not terribly worried about it for sake of argument, but never having
read Millay it seems a decent op****tunity to check her work out.

-- 
Nate Edel                               http://www.cubiclehermit.com/
 preferred email  | 
 is "nate" at the | "A sufficiently advanced incompetence is
 posting domain   |  indistinguishable from malice."