Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Anti-intell...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 25 of 69 Topic 6245 of 7425
Post > Topic >>

Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom

by Daniel Silevitch <dmsilev@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 9, 2008 at 01:08 PM

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 00:20:49 -0500, pete-moss <papajim7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

I'm pretty sure Keith was (correctly) objecting to you're posting using 
HMTL and multi-part MIME. Please set your newsreader software to put out 
plain text.

-dms

> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
[...]
> 
>   "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
> news:foit04$kd3$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>   Wrong.  Try again.
>   --=20
>   Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
>   Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html
before emailing me.
> ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C86AB1.9FF26E00
> Content-Type: text/html;
> 	charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3199" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2><FONT size=3D6>T</FONT>here is =
> nothing that cannot=20
> be understood [including sci-fi], and neither is there such a&nbsp;thing
=
> as=20
> secret knowledge.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2>Where one states that "many say the =
> sci-fi genre=20
> is not understood&nbsp;by academics,"&nbsp;does that mean it cannot
be=20
> understood, ever, by academics?</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2>Such an argument which states no =
> specific=20
> instances of understanding or misunderstanding by academics or =
> non-academics is=20
> hyperbolic and declarative.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2>If one follows their own =
> intuition&nbsp;and=20
> writes sci-fi, without worrying about&nbsp;academic criticism, one might
=
> make=20
> more progress.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2>Literary critics who do not write or =
> create=20
> anything themselves are at the bottom of the food chain. </FONT></DIV>
><DIV><EM><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2></FONT></EM>&nbsp;</DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2><EM>Ars longa, vita brevis</EM>&nbsp;
=
> (art is=20
> long, life is short)</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><EM><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2></FONT></EM>&nbsp;</DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2>-T&amp;C</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DGeorgia size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE=20
> style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
> BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
>  <DIV>"Keith F. Lynch" &lt;<A=20
>   href=3D"mailto:kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt; wrote in
=
> message=20
>  <A=20
>  =
>
href=3D"news:foit04$kd3$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:foit04$kd3$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> x.com</A>...</DIV><BR>Wrong.&nbsp;=20
>   Try again.<BR>-- <BR>Keith F. Lynch - <A=20
>   href=3D"http://keithlynch.net/">http://keithlynch.net/</A><BR>Please
=
> see <A=20
>  =
>
href=3D"http://keithlynch.net/email.html">http://keithlynch.net/email.htm=
> l</A>=20
>   before emailing me.</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
> 
> ------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C86AB1.9FF26E00--
>
 




 69 Posts in Topic:
Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Lee Ratner <LBRatner@[  2008-01-31 03:53:23 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-01-31 12:37:00 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Evelyn C. Leeper&qu  2008-01-31 09:43:23 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
tchello_mesquita@[EMAIL P  2008-01-31 06:58:55 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
tchello_mesquita@[EMAIL P  2008-01-31 07:00:57 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
tchello_mesquita@[EMAIL P  2008-01-31 07:02:01 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Martha Adams"   2008-02-02 03:28:13 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-02-11 20:02:07 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Lee Ratner <LBRatner@[  2008-01-31 10:23:52 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Andrew Plotkin <erkyra  2008-01-31 18:28:30 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-01-31 20:54:00 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-01 01:22:48 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-01 21:15:49 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-02-02 14:48:00 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Kay Shapero <kay@[EMAI  2008-02-01 21:24:27 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-02-02 15:56:00 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Petrea Mitchell <pravn  2008-02-03 18:33:27 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
mvp@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (M  2008-02-06 12:00:24 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"pete-moss" <  2008-02-08 01:15:30 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-08 19:43:48 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"pete-moss" <  2008-02-09 00:20:49 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-09 06:00:20 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Petre Moss" &l  2008-03-08 01:33:21 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-09 01:48:58 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Daniel Silevitch <dmsi  2008-02-09 13:08:04 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-09 14:04:55 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-09 23:56:20 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-10 12:19:17 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-10 19:36:07 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-02-11 20:13:14 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-09 23:39:33 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Petre Moss" &l  2008-02-28 01:24:24 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Will in New Haven <bil  2008-02-02 19:03:28 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Lowell Gilbert <lgusen  2008-02-03 15:09:58 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Will in New Haven <bil  2008-02-03 18:52:03 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
trinlay <trin1066@[EMA  2008-02-06 12:49:47 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-06 21:45:48 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-02-07 10:54:00 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-07 10:45:21 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-07 12:09:01 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-07 16:29:10 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-07 15:07:50 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-07 19:07:10 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-07 22:29:11 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-08 03:56:55 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-09 23:41:04 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
winston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-08 04:07:55 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-08 05:18:57 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Per Chr. J." &  2008-02-07 15:44:18 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-07 22:11:56 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-08 22:40:44 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-09 23:42:49 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-10 08:04:33 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-10 06:16:15 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Will in New Haven <bil  2008-02-10 11:50:31 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-10 12:21:47 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-10 16:49:40 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-10 22:39:25 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-10 21:46:31 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-10 20:34:53 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-02-11 20:15:25 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-11 22:48:14 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Will in New Haven <bil  2008-02-10 12:53:27 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-10 14:03:21 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-02-10 18:32:03 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-10 21:53:27 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
Will in New Haven <bil  2008-02-10 14:06:32 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-10 15:53:08 
Re: Anti-intellectualism in fandom
"Pete.Moss" <  2008-02-11 18:57:14 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 1:53:24 CST 2008.