:: It can go lots of ways. ...he's suicidal and/or psychotic, so he
:: shoots anyway. 100 people start firing their shot guns at the stage.
:: Some are bad shots, some are only good shots when they aren't full of
:: adrenalin (and these are side arms, not sniper rifles). Some
:: audience members are hit. Students in the hall hear hundreds of
:: gunshots and burst into the room with their sidearms, looking to put
:: an end to whatever nastiness is going on in the auditorium. Some
:: shoot at the shooters in the audience (seeing the hamburgered guy on
:: stage, and lots of screaming and bleeding audience members).
:: Students in the audience shoot back, thinking the ones who came from
:: the hall might be with the guy they shot on stage.
Heh. Well, somebody confiscating a gun from a visitor going into the
whitehouse could drop it, have it go off, the bullet ricochet through
a window near the president, startling him, causing him to push the
Big Red Button, nuclear war, all die, o the embarrassment.
So clearly, any attempt to keep guns out of the hands of visitors
to the whitehouse is a Bad Idea.
: David Friedman <ddfr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
: That scenario doesn't seem to have ever actually happened.
: And the available data--I linked to the paper--go the other way.
Oh, well, now you're just being... um... reasonable, or something.
Wayne Throop throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sheol.org/throopw
|
