Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Not always ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 10 of 617 Topic 6282 of 7092
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not always joking, it seems

by "Karl Johanson" <karljohanson@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 17, 2008 at 02:20 AM

"John Schilling" <schillin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:39:36 GMT, "Karl Johanson" 
> <karljohanson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>>It can go lots of ways. ...he's suicidal and/or psychotic, so he 
>>shoots
>>anyway. 100 people start firing their shot guns at the stage. Some are
>>bad shots, some are only good shots when they aren't full of adrenalin
>>(and these are side arms, not sniper rifles). Some audience members 
>>are
>>hit. Students in the hall hear hundreds of gunshots and burst into the
>>room with their sidearms, looking to put an end to whatever nastiness 
>>is
>>going on in the auditorium. Some shoot at the shooters in the audience
>>(seeing the hamburgered guy on stage, and lots of screaming and 
>>bleeding
>>audience members). Students in the audience shoot back, thinking the
>>ones who came from the hall might be with the guy they shot on stage.
>
> Is this truly how you expect you would react yourself, if for whatever
> reason you happened to be carrying a gun?

No, but I'm moderately well trained in firearms use. And I don't suggest 
every one would, or would in every case. As I said, "it can go lots of 
ways".

> You'd shoot into a crowd, in the general direction of a villain, even
> as other armed men and women have a clear field of fire to engage him
> without risk to bystanders?

Above, I mentioned the *possibility* that some might shoot at those 
shooting from the crowd, not that they'd shoot at the guy already shot 
from hundreds of audience members.

My point is that when untrained people see others firing guns, and don't 
know 'who started it', I don't expect they'll always act in an optimal 
way (especially if their adrenal gland is working over time).

> And then shoot any armed man who came to
> the scene of the crime, on the grounds that he might be in cahoots 
> with
> the original villain?  Or, if you weren't there from the start, you'd
> respond to the sound of gunfire by ru****ng in and shooting every armed
> man you saw?

> Interesting.  Where do you live again?

I used to live next door to people who were making some French fries. 
They left the oil heating and went into their back yard to play soccer. 
The oil caught fire. While the 12 year old among them got a garden hose, 
the other dozen or so people there ran around in circles (literally). 
Some people don't react well to unusual cir***stance. (One of them 
turned off the power to the kitchen from the breakers in their ground 
floor, at my suggestion.)

Karl Johanson
 




 617 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Willie.Mookie@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-16 03:38:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 10:21:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Dimensional Travele  2008-02-16 11:20:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kat R <null.space@[EMA  2008-02-16 14:32:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-16 19:39:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 12:45:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 00:50:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 16:55:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-16 17:30:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 02:20:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-17 08:47:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 16:57:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-17 10:50:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-17 11:34:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 19:39:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-18 06:07:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
jgd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (J  2008-02-17 19:44:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-02-18 03:53:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-03-06 18:23:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Johnston <david@  2008-02-17 19:48:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-17 12:08:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-17 12:25:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:21:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 19:48:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:42:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-22 16:11:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 21:54:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:24:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-19 01:00:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:16:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-19 04:03:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:28:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 01:39:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-20 02:49:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-19 13:18:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-19 21:46:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-19 18:25:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 02:49:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:25:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 21:02:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 00:55:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 13:17:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 18:42:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-24 18:28:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-24 13:51:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-02-24 17:36:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-24 16:20:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-01 04:04:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-03 21:33:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David T. Bilek <davidb  2008-02-23 19:49:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 01:20:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:23:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 17:52:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:00:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:12:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:26:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:11:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:31:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 03:06:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:21:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:27:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 19:31:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:43:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:01:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:22:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 17:54:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:03:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:14:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:22:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 15:50:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:30:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 02:18:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-20 02:49:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-19 12:00:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 21:29:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:07:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:03:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 15:51:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 18:44:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 01:19:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-18 12:25:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 17:55:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-17 15:09:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:21:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 19:56:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 21:40:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 21:51:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 22:19:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 22:43:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 22:48:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 22:56:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:05:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 23:12:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:24:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 23:50:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 00:00:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-18 16:43:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:14:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-19 03:53:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-18 23:18:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-18 21:20:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:12:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-18 21:21:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:26:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-19 05:55:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:11:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:04:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-28 00:14:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-27 23:26:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-18 16:42:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 00:48:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:16:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:29:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 03:41:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:21:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 03:38:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:13:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 05:21:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:32:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 05:43:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:25:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 03:25:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 09:21:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 12:13:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 12:33:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-19 12:35:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 15:24:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 14:26:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 20:26:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-19 11:50:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 15:25:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 20:23:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:01:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 22:21:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:41:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 23:42:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-20 10:34:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-20 21:21:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 16:35:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:26:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:31:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 19:56:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-02-21 19:59:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 20:04:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-02-21 14:15:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-21 21:15:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-21 21:29:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 21:24:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:35:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:09:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:08:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:26:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-26 23:34:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-27 14:35:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-27 11:56:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 10:36:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-27 18:58:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-27 15:32:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:15:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 20:43:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 15:08:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-02-28 11:40:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-29 11:11:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 10:36:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-27 21:19:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 16:35:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 20:07:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 20:11:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-21 12:44:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:46:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:18:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:23:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:34:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:38:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:51:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:59:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 00:26:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-22 09:43:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-22 10:32:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 17:46:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-22 13:29:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 18:08:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-23 10:43:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-23 09:01:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 12:51:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-23 16:23:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 16:58:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-24 06:22:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-24 14:52:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Edward McArdle <mcardl  2008-02-26 21:03:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 22:05:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 18:47:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-23 12:37:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 17:55:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:16:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:05:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-22 08:48:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 17:47:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:01:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:17:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:48:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:19:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:24:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:34:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 20:18:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:21:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:46:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 12:39:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:22:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:44:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 21:54:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-22 07:36:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-22 08:15:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-22 08:19:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-23 04:21:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:54:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-23 04:20:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-22 21:05:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-23 05:16:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 00:18:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-21 19:26:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 16:50:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:20:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"AJ" <tortur  2008-02-26 12:38:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-26 16:40:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:21:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-26 09:50:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 09:16:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-26 17:17:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:13:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:37:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:51:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-21 21:02:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 18:08:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:45:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-22 05:57:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:16:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-26 17:09:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:50:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 00:29:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-22 08:09:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:51:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-22 22:53:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-25 16:02:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 19:33:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-26 17:09:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-27 02:58:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 01:09:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-27 06:17:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David T. Bilek <davidb  2008-02-26 22:39:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-27 07:06:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:20:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:09:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-27 18:12:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 21:51:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-28 03:43:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 21:52:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-29 06:12:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-29 00:02:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 21:54:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-01 04:08:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-03-01 20:43:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David T. Bilek <davidb  2008-03-01 22:47:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-03-03 01:46:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-03-06 19:52:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-25 23:05:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-03-26 08:23:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-26 22:33:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-27 06:52:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-27 06:51:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-27 14:57:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:19:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:11:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 21:21:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:38:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 04:40:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 21:40:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 01:37:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-23 02:53:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 03:49:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-23 03:59:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-23 03:45:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-23 06:07:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 19:40:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 12:21:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-26 17:11:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-26 20:40:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:18:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 01:10:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-27 07:59:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:12:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-27 15:09:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:13:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-28 03:50:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-28 14:56:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-29 06:13:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 22:06:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:06:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 09:15:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:18:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 10:32:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 11:06:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 12:18:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:22:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:34:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-28 01:09:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:14:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-26 17:12:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 20:45:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-27 08:09:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 19:35:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 12:10:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:14:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 12:20:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:39:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:19:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-27 07:05:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 03:01:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-27 15:01:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 20:48:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 22:12:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-02 11:40:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-03-02 16:39:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-03-02 22:02:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-03-02 15:07:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-03-02 19:05:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-02 17:45:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-03-02 15:00:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-27 09:30:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 10:34:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-02-27 17:01:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-27 12:09:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 22:32:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:05:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:16:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 22:13:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 22:34:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:16:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:24:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-27 07:08:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 03:00:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-27 19:04:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-27 18:11:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-28 11:32:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
lathamr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 22:24:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-28 03:47:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 20:41:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-28 05:04:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 07:10:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 05:55:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-28 09:21:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-28 19:18:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Robert A. Woodward&  2008-02-28 23:27:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 21:06:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-28 18:03:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 21:17:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 19:57:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-29 18:53:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-29 21:14:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 18:04:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 08:58:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-05 08:10:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 15:20:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-05 07:20:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 16:32:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-05 08:36:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-05 20:37:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-05 20:49:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Joe Ellis <synthfilker  2008-03-06 11:39:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-06 23:28:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-06 18:31:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-06 19:13:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Patrick Baldwin <pax@[  2008-03-07 17:38:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-05 19:49:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-28 13:28:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-29 21:59:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 05:52:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-28 09:18:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 16:29:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems