Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Not always ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 7 Topic 6288 of 7038
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not always joking, it seems

by Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 17, 2008 at 09:48 AM

David Friedman wrote:
> In article 
> <6386119a-a980-42f8-8234-c674a8d4b152@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  Willie.Mookie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> 
>> What Ford found though when they did market studies was that car sales
>> would plummet along with profits.  Why?   Because personal buyers
>> would more than likely disappear as they went to high quality taxi
>> services that didn't have to pay drivers, and they'd have a large
>> number of high quality cars sitting around available at little over
>> cost..  Fleet buyers would dominate and about 1/4 the number of autos
>> would be sold.  It would end congestion, and be more efficient - but
>> it would kill the auto-industry.  So, you don't see it.
> 
> And you know all this how?
> 
> Let me offer three reasons not to believe it.
> 
> 1. Ford was not and is not the majority of the auto industry. If they 
> can produce a driverless car, they will have a much larger share of that

> market--even if it is a smaller one.
> 
> 2. Switching to taxi services doesn't reduce the number of miles driven 
> per year--indeed, if they are more convenient, it increases the number. 
> Most cars, so far as I can see, end up wearing out. So if the average 
> car is good for a hundred thousand miles and total driving is (say) 
> 10^12 car miles/year, about ten million cars a year will be purchased. 
> So it wouldn't be a smaller market but a bigger one.
> 
> 3. One of my colleagues was involved over a period of several years with

> the project to try to design an intelligent highway--a modern system 
> along the lines you describe, with cars computer controlled. They 
> eventually gave up. If it isn't practical now, with current computer 
> technology, it seems extraordinarily unlikely that it was practical 
> fifty years ago.
> 
> Or in other words, you believe it because it is a good story.
> 
Anyway, the biggest drawback to a system like that is the network of 
"wires" that would need to be laid in the roadways.  Think of the HUGE 
  project that would be - and there would still be roads that would be 
"off network" .... or do you think they'd lay wires to every farmhouse 
and barn?

The driverless car as a taxi system seems to have a future in certain 
environments.   Just such a system is being piloted at Heathrow 
Air****t outside London.

http://www.thealarmclock.com/euro/archives/2007/12/halting_state_driver.html



-- 
Jette Goldie
jette@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
("reply to" is spamblocked - use the email addy in sig)
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Willie.Mookie@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-16 18:42:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 19:13:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 09:48:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 01:07:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-18 11:18:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:28:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Matthias Warkus <Warku  2008-02-17 13:25:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Wed Jul 9 0:29:30 CDT 2008.