Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Best and wo...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 4 Topic 6289 of 7092
Post > Topic >>

Re: Best and worst lines of Boskone so far

by "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 17, 2008 at 11:46 AM

Andrew Plotkin <erkyrath@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Guy Consolmagno (astronomer and Jesuit) in a history-of-science
> panel.  Approximately, "Two fat books are in my study: the Bible,
> and Misner, Thorne, Wheeler.  (A well-known physics textbook.)
> The Bible is two millenia old. The MTW is an edition 25 years old.
> The MTW is out of date."

I thought there was only one edition of _Gravitation_ (aka MTW), and
that it was 35 years ago.

I have an autographed copy.  When I have physics-oriented visitors,
I like to point to it and and ask whether that book has more
gravitational effect on them than the moon does.  Then I ask the same
question about tidal effect.  (If they know the relevant scaling laws,
they should be able to answer both questions instantly.)
-- 
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html
before emailing me.
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Best and worst lines of Boskone so far
Andrew Plotkin <erkyra  2008-02-17 04:51:00 
Re: Best and worst lines of Boskone so far
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-17 11:46:32 
Re: Best and worst lines of Boskone so far
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-17 17:41:40 
Re: Best and worst lines of Boskone so far
Lowell Gilbert <lgusen  2008-02-19 13:55:37 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 1:37:09 CDT 2008.