Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Not always ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 53 of 617 Topic 6282 of 7093
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not always joking, it seems

by mike weber <fairportfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 18, 2008 at 05:52 PM

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:23:17 GMT, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
<taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>mike weber <fair****tfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
>news:or8ir3dl0fecr60f172lfbo16a9hq8fdg6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:08:12 -0800, David Friedman
>> <ddfr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>>>In article <cr3hr3l91ol10potv5ci66t9jlgeo5i3fe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>>> David Johnston <david@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>> 
>> 
>>>> Friendly fire incidents have happened many times.  
>>>
>>>Sure. But they don't generally take the form described.
>> 
>> The Tillman incident seems to have.
>> 
>> And the military tried diligently to cover it up.
>> 
>> Wonder how many have sucessfully been covered up?
>> 
>Absence of evidence isn't evidence. Belief that it is proves 
>idiocy.

Knowledge without evidence to "prove" it is something else.

Not that i was claiming that lack of evicence is evidence, merely
wondering if there might have been more cases that *had* been
successfully covered up.  COnsistent with the military mind, based on
Close Personal Experience with it.

The classic case of belief that lack of evidence is evidence would be
the Kenedy conspiracy theorists, though more recently Limbaugh and his
ilk wer eclaiming that the very fact that there was no evidence that
Clkinton did anything illegal was proof of how successfully it had
been hushed up...
 




 617 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Willie.Mookie@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-16 03:38:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 10:21:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Dimensional Travele  2008-02-16 11:20:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kat R <null.space@[EMA  2008-02-16 14:32:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-16 19:39:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 12:45:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 00:50:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 16:55:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-16 17:30:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 02:20:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-17 08:47:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 16:57:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-17 10:50:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-17 11:34:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 19:39:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-18 06:07:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
jgd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (J  2008-02-17 19:44:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-02-18 03:53:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-03-06 18:23:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Johnston <david@  2008-02-17 19:48:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-17 12:08:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-17 12:25:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:21:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 19:48:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:42:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-22 16:11:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 21:54:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:24:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-19 01:00:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:16:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-19 04:03:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:28:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 01:39:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-20 02:49:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-19 13:18:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-19 21:46:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-19 18:25:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 02:49:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:25:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 21:02:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 00:55:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 13:17:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 18:42:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-24 18:28:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-24 13:51:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-02-24 17:36:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-24 16:20:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-01 04:04:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-03 21:33:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David T. Bilek <davidb  2008-02-23 19:49:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 01:20:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:23:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 17:52:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:00:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:12:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:26:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:11:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:31:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 03:06:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:21:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:27:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 19:31:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:43:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:01:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:22:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 17:54:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:03:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:14:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:22:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 15:50:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:30:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 02:18:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-20 02:49:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-19 12:00:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 21:29:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:07:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:03:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 15:51:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 18:44:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 01:19:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-18 12:25:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 17:55:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-17 15:09:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:21:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 19:56:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 21:40:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 21:51:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 22:19:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 22:43:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 22:48:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 22:56:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:05:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 23:12:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:24:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 23:50:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 00:00:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-18 16:43:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:14:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-19 03:53:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-18 23:18:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-18 21:20:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:12:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-18 21:21:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:26:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-19 05:55:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:11:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:04:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-28 00:14:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-27 23:26:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-18 16:42:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 00:48:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:16:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:29:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 03:41:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:21:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 03:38:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:13:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 05:21:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:32:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 05:43:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:25:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 03:25:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 09:21:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 12:13:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 12:33:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-19 12:35:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 15:24:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 14:26:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 20:26:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-19 11:50:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 15:25:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 20:23:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:01:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 22:21:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:41:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 23:42:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-20 10:34:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-20 21:21:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 16:35:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:26:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:31:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 19:56:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-02-21 19:59:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 20:04:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-02-21 14:15:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-21 21:15:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-21 21:29:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 21:24:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:35:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:09:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:08:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:26:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-26 23:34:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-27 14:35:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-27 11:56:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 10:36:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-27 18:58:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-27 15:32:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:15:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 20:43:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 15:08:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-02-28 11:40:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-29 11:11:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 10:36:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-27 21:19:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 16:35:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 20:07:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 20:11:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-21 12:44:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:46:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:18:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:23:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:34:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:38:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:51:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:59:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 00:26:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-22 09:43:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-22 10:32:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 17:46:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-22 13:29:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 18:08:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-23 10:43:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-23 09:01:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 12:51:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-23 16:23:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 16:58:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-24 06:22:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-24 14:52:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Edward McArdle <mcardl  2008-02-26 21:03:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 22:05:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 18:47:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-23 12:37:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 17:55:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:16:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:05:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-22 08:48:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 17:47:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:01:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:17:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:48:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:19:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:24:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:34:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 20:18:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:21:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:46:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 12:39:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:22:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:44:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 21:54:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-22 07:36:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-22 08:15:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-22 08:19:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-23 04:21:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:54:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-23 04:20:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-22 21:05:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-23 05:16:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 00:18:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-21 19:26:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 16:50:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:20:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"AJ" <tortur  2008-02-26 12:38:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-26 16:40:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:21:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-26 09:50:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 09:16:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-26 17:17:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:13:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:37:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:51:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-21 21:02:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 18:08:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:45:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-22 05:57:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:16:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-26 17:09:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:50:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 00:29:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-22 08:09:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:51:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-22 22:53:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-25 16:02:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 19:33:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-26 17:09:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-27 02:58:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 01:09:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-27 06:17:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David T. Bilek <davidb  2008-02-26 22:39:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-27 07:06:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:20:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:09:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-27 18:12:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 21:51:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-28 03:43:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 21:52:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-29 06:12:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-29 00:02:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 21:54:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-01 04:08:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-03-01 20:43:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David T. Bilek <davidb  2008-03-01 22:47:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-03-03 01:46:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-03-06 19:52:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-25 23:05:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-03-26 08:23:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-26 22:33:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-27 06:52:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-27 06:51:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-27 14:57:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:19:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:11:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 21:21:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:38:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 04:40:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 21:40:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 01:37:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-23 02:53:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 03:49:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-23 03:59:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-23 03:45:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-23 06:07:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 19:40:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 12:21:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-26 17:11:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-26 20:40:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:18:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 01:10:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-27 07:59:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:12:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-27 15:09:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:13:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-28 03:50:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-28 14:56:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-29 06:13:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 22:06:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:06:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 09:15:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:18:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 10:32:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 11:06:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 12:18:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:22:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:34:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-28 01:09:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:14:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-26 17:12:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 20:45:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-27 08:09:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 19:35:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 12:10:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:14:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 12:20:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:39:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:19:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-27 07:05:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 03:01:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-27 15:01:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 20:48:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 22:12:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-02 11:40:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-03-02 16:39:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-03-02 22:02:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-03-02 15:07:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-03-02 19:05:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-02 17:45:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-03-02 15:00:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-27 09:30:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 10:34:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-02-27 17:01:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-27 12:09:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 22:32:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:05:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:16:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 22:13:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 22:34:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:16:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:24:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-27 07:08:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 03:00:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-27 19:04:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-27 18:11:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-28 11:32:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
lathamr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 22:24:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-28 03:47:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 20:41:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-28 05:04:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 07:10:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 05:55:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-28 09:21:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-28 19:18:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Robert A. Woodward&  2008-02-28 23:27:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 21:06:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-28 18:03:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 21:17:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 19:57:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-29 18:53:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-29 21:14:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 18:04:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 08:58:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-05 08:10:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 15:20:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-05 07:20:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 16:32:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-05 08:36:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-05 20:37:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-05 20:49:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Joe Ellis <synthfilker  2008-03-06 11:39:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-06 23:28:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-06 18:31:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-06 19:13:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Patrick Baldwin <pax@[  2008-03-07 17:38:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-05 19:49:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-28 13:28:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-29 21:59:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 05:52:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-28 09:18:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 16:29:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-28 17:34:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 19:53:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 19:33:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 12:11:38