Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Not always ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 56 of 617 Topic 6282 of 7038
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not always joking, it seems

by Terry Austin <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 19, 2008 at 03:26 AM

mike weber <fair****tfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
news:06ikr3l9psvr5d2n1qf9mmf8athum668g0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:00:50 GMT, Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy
> <taustinca@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>>mike weber <fair****tfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>news:2s2kr3h9i8subigtjnqhch9s810rjm2tpd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
>  
>>> Not that i was claiming that lack of evicence is evidence,
>>> merely wondering if there might have been more cases that *had*
>>> been successfully covered up.  COnsistent with the military
>>> mind, based on Close Personal Experience with it.
>>
>>Yeah, they're all out to get you.
> 
> No - i remember what my time in Uncle Sammy's Canoe Club was like.  I
> don't claim that any suich thing *has* happened.  I do say that it
> *could have* happened, and we wouldn't know if it ha unless someone
> exposed it, like unto the Tillman case.

Yeah, whatever. Your defense against dishonesty and paranoia is that 
you're simply pointless.
>>> 
>>> The classic case of belief that lack of evidence is evidence
>>> would be the Kenedy conspiracy theorists, though more recently
>>> Limbaugh and his ilk wer eclaiming that the very fact that there
>>> was no evidence that Clkinton did anything illegal was proof of
>>> how successfully it had been hushed up...
>>> 
>>I really can't see much difference between their statemens and 
>>yours.
> 
> No, you can't, can you?
> 
Was there a word you didn't understand?

-- 
Terry Austin
"Dude, we're all your *****, but only Ken's wearing the juice."
                                           - tussock

"Just throw a rock, and what screams will probably be a moron."
                                           - Elvis (no, not that Elvis)
 




 617 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Willie.Mookie@[EMAIL PROT  2008-02-16 03:38:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 10:21:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Dimensional Travele  2008-02-16 11:20:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kat R <null.space@[EMA  2008-02-16 14:32:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-16 19:39:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 12:45:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 00:50:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-16 16:55:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-16 17:30:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 02:20:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-17 08:47:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 16:57:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-17 10:50:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-17 11:34:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-17 19:39:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-18 06:07:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
jgd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (J  2008-02-17 19:44:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-02-18 03:53:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-03-06 18:23:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Johnston <david@  2008-02-17 19:48:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-17 12:08:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-17 12:25:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:21:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 19:48:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:42:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-22 16:11:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-17 21:54:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:24:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-19 01:00:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:16:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-19 04:03:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:28:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 01:39:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-20 02:49:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-19 13:18:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-19 21:46:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-19 18:25:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 02:49:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:25:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 21:02:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 00:55:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 13:17:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 18:42:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-24 18:28:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-24 13:51:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-02-24 17:36:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-24 16:20:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-01 04:04:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-03 21:33:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David T. Bilek <davidb  2008-02-23 19:49:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 01:20:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:23:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 17:52:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:00:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:12:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:26:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:11:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:31:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 03:06:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:21:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:27:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 19:31:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:43:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:01:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:22:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 17:54:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:03:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:14:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:22:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-19 15:50:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:30:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-20 02:18:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-20 02:49:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-19 12:00:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 21:29:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:07:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:03:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 15:51:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 18:44:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 01:19:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-18 12:25:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 17:55:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-17 15:09:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 19:21:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 19:56:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 21:40:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 21:51:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 22:19:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 22:43:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 22:48:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 22:56:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:05:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 23:12:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-18 23:24:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-18 23:50:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 00:00:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-18 16:43:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:14:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-19 03:53:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-18 23:18:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-18 21:20:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:12:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-18 21:21:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:26:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-19 05:55:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:11:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:04:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-28 00:14:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-27 23:26:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-18 16:42:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 00:48:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:16:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 03:29:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 03:41:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:21:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 03:38:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 00:13:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 05:21:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:32:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 05:43:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-19 17:25:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 03:25:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 09:21:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 12:13:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 12:33:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-19 12:35:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 15:24:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 14:26:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 20:26:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-19 11:50:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-19 15:25:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-19 20:23:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:01:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 22:21:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:41:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 23:42:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM  2008-02-20 10:34:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-20 21:21:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-20 16:35:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-19 05:26:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 19:31:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 19:56:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Aaron Denney <wnoise@[  2008-02-21 19:59:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 20:04:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-02-21 14:15:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-21 21:15:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-21 21:29:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 21:24:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:35:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:09:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:08:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:26:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-26 23:34:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-27 14:35:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-27 11:56:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 10:36:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-27 18:58:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-27 15:32:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:15:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 20:43:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 15:08:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-02-28 11:40:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-29 11:11:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 10:36:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-27 21:19:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 16:35:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 20:07:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 20:11:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-21 12:44:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:46:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:18:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:23:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:34:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:38:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:51:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:59:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 00:26:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-22 09:43:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-22 10:32:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 17:46:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-22 13:29:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 18:08:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-23 10:43:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-23 09:01:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 12:51:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-23 16:23:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 16:58:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
goldfarb@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-02-24 06:22:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-24 14:52:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Edward McArdle <mcardl  2008-02-26 21:03:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 22:05:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 18:47:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-23 12:37:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 17:55:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jasper Janssen <jasper  2008-03-11 21:16:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-03-11 23:05:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-22 08:48:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-22 17:47:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:01:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:17:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:48:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:19:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 23:24:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 23:34:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 20:18:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:21:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:46:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 12:39:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gutless Umbrella Carrying  2008-02-21 21:22:48 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 21:44:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 21:54:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-22 07:36:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-22 08:15:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-22 08:19:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-23 04:21:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:54:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-23 04:20:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-22 21:05:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-23 05:16:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 00:18:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-21 19:26:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 16:50:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:20:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"AJ" <tortur  2008-02-26 12:38:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-26 16:40:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:21:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-02-26 09:50:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 09:16:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-02-26 17:17:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:13:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:37:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:51:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"pullo" <pul  2008-02-21 21:02:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 18:08:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:45:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-22 05:57:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:16:27 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-26 17:09:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 18:50:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 00:29:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-22 08:09:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:51:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-22 22:53:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-25 16:02:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 19:33:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-26 17:09:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-27 02:58:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 01:09:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-27 06:17:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David T. Bilek <davidb  2008-02-26 22:39:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-27 07:06:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:20:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:09:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-27 18:12:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 21:51:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-28 03:43:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 21:52:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-29 06:12:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-29 00:02:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 21:54:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-01 04:08:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-03-01 20:43:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David T. Bilek <davidb  2008-03-01 22:47:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Harmon <source@[  2008-03-03 01:46:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-03-06 19:52:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-25 23:05:15 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-03-26 08:23:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-26 22:33:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-27 06:52:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-27 06:51:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-27 14:57:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:19:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:11:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 21:21:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:38:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 04:40:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 21:40:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 01:37:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-23 02:53:17 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-23 03:49:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-23 03:59:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-23 03:45:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Terry Austin <taustinc  2008-02-23 06:07:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 19:40:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 12:21:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-26 17:11:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-26 20:40:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:18:23 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 01:10:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-27 07:59:26 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:12:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-27 15:09:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-27 17:13:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-28 03:50:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-28 14:56:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-29 06:13:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-28 22:06:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-26 16:06:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 09:15:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 10:18:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 10:32:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 11:06:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-26 12:18:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:22:19 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 21:34:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-28 01:09:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:14:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-26 17:12:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 20:45:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-27 08:09:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 19:35:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 12:10:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:14:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 12:20:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:39:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:19:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-27 07:05:58 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 03:01:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-27 15:01:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 20:48:55 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 22:12:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-02 11:40:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-03-02 16:39:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-03-02 22:02:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-03-02 15:07:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-03-02 19:05:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-02 17:45:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-03-02 15:00:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-27 09:30:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 10:34:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-02-27 17:01:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-27 12:09:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 22:32:16 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-26 21:05:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:16:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-27 22:13:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-27 22:34:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 20:16:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-26 22:24:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-27 07:08:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 03:00:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-27 19:04:22 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-27 18:11:14 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-28 11:32:43 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
lathamr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-27 22:24:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-28 03:47:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-27 20:41:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-28 05:04:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 07:10:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 05:55:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-28 09:21:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling&quo  2008-02-28 19:18:52 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Robert A. Woodward&  2008-02-28 23:27:06 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 21:06:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-28 18:03:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-28 21:17:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 19:57:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-29 18:53:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-02-29 21:14:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-04 18:04:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 08:58:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-05 08:10:53 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 15:20:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-05 07:20:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Peter Bruells <usernet  2008-03-05 16:32:38 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-03-05 08:36:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-05 20:37:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-05 20:49:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Joe Ellis <synthfilker  2008-03-06 11:39:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-06 23:28:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
cgoodin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-06 18:31:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sea Wasp <seawaspObvio  2008-03-06 19:13:31 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Patrick Baldwin <pax@[  2008-03-07 17:38:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-03-05 19:49:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-28 13:28:11 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Karl Johanson"  2008-02-29 21:59:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 05:52:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-28 09:18:24 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-28 16:29:29 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-28 17:34:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <howard@  2008-02-28 19:53:57 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-26 19:33:18