Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Not always ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 61 Topic 6305 of 7018
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not always joking, it seems

by John Schilling <schillin@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 19, 2008 at 06:25 PM

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:07:02 -0500, mike weber <fairportfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:01:47 -0800 (PST), "louann_m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
><louann_m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Feb 18, 12:16 am, mike weber <fairport...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:30:34 -0800, John Schilling
>>>
>>> <schil...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> >Is this truly how you expect you would react yourself, if for
whatever
>>> >reason you happened to be carrying a gun?

>>> >You'd shoot into a crowd, in the general direction of a villain, even
>>> >as other armed men and women have a clear field of fire to engage him
>>> >without risk to bystanders?  And then shoot any armed man who came to
>>> >the scene of the crime, on the grounds that he might be in cahoots
with
>>> >the original villain?  Or, if you weren't there from the start, you'd
>>> >respond to the sound of gunfire by rushing in and shooting every
armed
>>> >man you saw?

>>> Again - cionsider the "assassination" of Huey Long.

>>(one visit to http://www.hueylong.com/life-times/assassination.php
>>later)

>>Why the scare quotes? If a political figure gets killed for his
>>political opinions, assassination is the standard term. Some people
>>even use it for Lennon.

>There is reason to doubt whether the "assassin" actually killed Long,
>since his bodyguards cut loose with .45s and appear to have hit him at
>least once or tweic; as i remarked above, Weiss had something like a
>.32 revolver, a weapon slightly more dealy than a .25 calibre beadroom
>gun.

Which you may note is .03 calibers greater than one of the more common,
and successful, assassination weapons.


>Between .45s and a .32, i know which i'd pick as probable cause of
>death.

Well, yeah.  Whichever one was aimed by an assassin, rather than hit by
dumb luck.

The lethality of pistol bullets, or more commonly the lack thereof, has
*far* more to do with where the bullet hits, than with how big a bullet
it is.  


-- 
*John Schilling                    * "Anything worth doing,         *
*Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP       *  is worth doing for money"     *
*Chief Scientist & General Partner *    -13th Rule of Acquisition   *
*White Elephant Research, LLC      * "There is no substitute        *
*John.Schilling@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
     *  for success"                  *
*661-951-9107 or 661-275-6795      *    -58th Rule of Acquisition   *




 61 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"louann_m@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-18 11:01:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-18 12:41:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 18:17:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-18 15:49:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:08:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:17:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 23:46:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-20 00:08:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 15:45:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-20 06:53:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-20 10:05:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 18:07:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-19 18:25:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 22:47:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-19 22:25:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 02:52:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-20 08:17:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 13:57:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-20 19:14:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 20:02:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 01:10:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 21:15:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 02:59:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 22:18:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 03:23:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 22:33:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 04:11:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 02:06:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 12:09:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 07:38:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 16:04:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-21 18:53:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-21 04:27:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-21 03:45:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 23:18:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 04:33:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-20 23:51:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 02:05:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 07:21:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 04:37:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 12:03:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 12:04:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 07:37:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 13:35:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 19:02:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 13:41:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 21:33:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 21:42:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 22:05:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:36:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 19:03:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 00:31:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-21 20:18:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 04:49:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:47:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-02-22 03:47:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-22 17:19:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 01:00:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"louann_m@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-19 16:24:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-19 22:08:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:37:54 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 4 16:45:41 CDT 2008.