Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Not always ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 16 of 61 Topic 6305 of 7018
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not always joking, it seems

by mike weber <fairportfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 20, 2008 at 02:52 AM

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:25:21 -0800, David Friedman
<ddfr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>In article <7e8nr3l55r47727mksf7coot4o3dc971uv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> mike weber <fairportfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> And the .22 round used for assassination is rather more powerful, to
>> say the least, than a .25; a .22 short isn't much for killing people
>> either.
>
>I don't know about the particular round used for assassination, but it 
>looks from a little googling as though a .32 ACP has about 130 ft pounds 
>of energy, a .22 LR from a rifle barrel about 140 ft pounds, so if both 
>are used in pistols I would think the .32 would have at least comparable 
>energy.

Maybe.  I think i said that it was "not much more powerful thanb a
..22"; neither is much of a manstopper.

I once personally knew a young man who was shot in the head with a .22
Saturday night special; when he arrived at the hospital, the doctor
was rather upset to see the apparent exit wound almost diametrically
opposite the entry; it turned out that the bullet had not had
sufficient energy to penetrate the bone and had travelled under ths
skin to wher it emerged.

Weiss's gun was apparently found under his body, jammed, with five of
a maximum load of seven still in it.

I found this while looking for more info:

"Louisiana historian Mike Wayne states the following: 'There are
basically three accepted versions of what happened. Version one is
that Dr. Weiss shot Huey twice and the bodyguards killed Weiss... The
second version is that Weiss did something-either slapped Long or
argued with him or pulled a gun... and the bodyguards started firing
and accidentally hit Long in the confusion. The third possibility is
that he was assassinated by one or more bodyguards planted by
anti-Long forces, and Weiss was a convenient scapegoat...We do know
that two bullets of two different caliber were removed from Long's
body, and neither was the same caliber as Weiss's gun.'"

I don't know if i believe that myself, sinceother sources say there
was no autopsy...




 61 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"louann_m@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-18 11:01:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-18 12:41:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 18:17:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-18 15:49:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:08:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:17:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 23:46:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-20 00:08:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 15:45:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-20 06:53:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-20 10:05:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 18:07:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-19 18:25:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 22:47:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-19 22:25:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 02:52:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-20 08:17:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 13:57:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-20 19:14:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 20:02:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 01:10:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 21:15:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 02:59:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 22:18:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 03:23:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 22:33:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 04:11:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 02:06:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 12:09:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 07:38:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 16:04:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-21 18:53:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-21 04:27:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-21 03:45:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 23:18:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 04:33:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-20 23:51:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 02:05:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 07:21:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 04:37:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 12:03:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 12:04:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 07:37:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 13:35:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 19:02:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 13:41:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 21:33:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 21:42:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 22:05:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:36:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 19:03:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 00:31:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-21 20:18:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 04:49:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:47:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-02-22 03:47:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-22 17:19:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 01:00:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"louann_m@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-19 16:24:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-19 22:08:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:37:54 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 4 16:31:15 CDT 2008.