Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Not always ...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Re: Not always joking, it seems

by mike weber <fairportfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 20, 2008 at 09:45 PM

On 20 Feb 2008 21:32:23 -0500, "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>My understanding is that there's good reason for copper pipe
>-- it fails gracefully, with pinhole leaks.  PVC pipe fails
>catastrophically, causing floods that may destroy everything
>in the house.

It's not PVC that fails catastrophically, i think - it's a different
but similar material, which is no longer allowed.

142 Posts in Topic:

"Karl M. Syring"

2008-02-16 10:13:22

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Matthias Warkus <Warku

2008-02-19 12:20:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-19 12:12:19

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-19 20:23:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

ted@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T

2008-02-20 01:27:06

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-19 20:46:18

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-20 16:32:19

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-20 09:50:52

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-20 18:05:51

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-20 10:32:04

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Colette Reap <colette@

2008-02-20 20:53:26

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-20 12:55:13

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 20:59:09

Re: Not always joking, it seems

prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-02-21 12:04:00

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 10:08:57

Re: Not always joking, it seems

prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-02-22 10:59:00

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 13:30:42

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 10:05:27

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 18:32:38

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 16:11:18

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM

2008-02-21 10:17:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 18:40:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 16:24:53

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:34:29

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Colette Reap <colette@

2008-02-22 19:46:06

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-22 13:43:17

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-23 00:07:10

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-22 17:02:11

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-23 00:05:42

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-22 20:47:50

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-22 21:10:59

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-23 13:42:02

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 10:52:47

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-23 14:50:13

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Sean O'Hara <seanohara

2008-02-23 12:54:00

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-27 14:07:11

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-27 22:06:46

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-28 14:07:07

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-28 19:54:45

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-29 17:09:21

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-28 16:31:04

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:33:17

Re: Not always joking, it seems

tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (

2008-02-26 16:23:47

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-27 20:28:43

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Sean O'Hara <seanohara

2008-02-20 17:09:37

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-20 15:10:06

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 13:26:10

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 10:07:01

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 18:38:01

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 16:08:15

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-22 00:35:22

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 13:20:19

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 21:32:23

Re: Not always joking, it seems

mike weber <fairportfa

2008-02-20 21:45:32

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Jay E. Morris"

2008-02-21 02:58:09

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Doug Wickstrom <nimshu

2008-03-06 18:31:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-20 20:15:35

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 21:12:05

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 13:37:17

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-21 15:50:13

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:41:25

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-26 15:17:48

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 22:25:23

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-21 17:36:39

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 16:25:35

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:42:16

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-22 22:22:46

Re: Not always joking, it seems

mike weber <fairportfa

2008-02-23 00:52:37

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-23 13:19:16

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Harmon <source@[

2008-02-23 14:22:53

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-23 17:30:52

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:43:38

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-25 22:54:48

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-25 22:45:50

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-27 20:53:24

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-27 20:45:40

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-27 20:43:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-28 20:23:29

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Karl Johanson"

2008-02-28 04:57:31

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-28 20:19:11

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Karl Johanson"

2008-03-01 05:21:36

Re: Not always joking, it seems

justinf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-03-05 16:31:35

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-03-01 03:29:36

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 14:51:53

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-23 22:56:10

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 15:00:44

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-23 23:23:50

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 15:45:04

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-23 23:52:50

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 17:01:51

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-24 09:47:24

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-24 02:22:03

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:42:55

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-25 22:51:53

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-27 21:11:16

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 22:40:29

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 00:41:19

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 22:57:12

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-21 20:50:22

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-22 22:21:46

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Jay E. Morris"

2008-02-21 01:57:07

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"pullo" <pul

2008-02-19 21:56:23

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Mike Schilling"

2008-02-19 19:12:50

Re: Not always joking, it seems

John Schilling <schill

2008-02-20 18:33:10

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Mike Schilling"

2008-02-21 06:01:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"pullo" <pul

2008-02-21 21:22:45

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 21:20:28

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"pullo" <pul

2008-02-24 04:17:48

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-22 21:42:25

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-19 22:48:31

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM

2008-02-20 10:08:30

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-21 17:39:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 10:01:56

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Harmon <source@[

2008-02-21 23:19:16

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-22 01:06:40

Re: Not always joking, it seems

winston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-22 10:01:31

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-22 16:16:11

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-22 13:53:57

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Harmon <source@[

2008-02-22 13:46:45

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 15:51:21

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-26 10:20:12

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-03-06 03:15:26

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-26 21:48:26

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-03-01 03:31:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-03-03 21:36:14

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-03-04 03:29:30

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-03-03 21:36:31

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-03-04 11:48:37

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-03-04 21:30:25

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-03-05 03:40:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Kip Williams <kiptw@[E

2008-03-04 08:04:26

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-03-04 10:55:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-03-06 08:05:28

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-23 14:06:16

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 14:55:46

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Sean O'Hara <seanohara

2008-02-23 18:50:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Howard Brazee <pbrazee

2008-02-19 18:27:22

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-19 22:41:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

John Schilling <schill

2008-02-19 18:25:03

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-19 22:28:46

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Matthias Warkus <Warku

2008-02-20 18:45:24

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-20 10:24:41

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 15:38:14 CDT 2008.