Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Not always ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 57 of 61 Topic 6305 of 7092
Post > Topic >>

Re: Not always joking, it seems

by John Schilling <schillin@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 22, 2008 at 05:19 PM

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:47:21 -0500, mike weber <fair****tfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:25:03 -0800, John Schilling
><schillin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>>On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:07:02 -0500, mike weber <fair****tfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>wrote:

>>>There is reason to doubt whether the "assassin" actually killed Long,
>>>since his bodyguards cut loose with .45s and appear to have hit him at
>>>least once or tweic; as i remarked above, Weiss had something like a
>>>.32 revolver, a weapon slightly more dealy than a .25 calibre beadroom
>>>gun.
>>Which you may note is .03 calibers greater than one of the more common,
>>and successful, assassination weapons.

>So? The .25 cartidge and most of the guns that fire it is ****;
>sometimes it's doing good to penetrate a heavy coat, and that at
>relatively close range.

>A friend of mine when i was in Sicily in the Navy was shot three times
>in the legs with a .25, and, until he saw blood on his pant leg,
>thought he'd been shot with a BB gun.

>And the .22 round used for assassination is rather more powerful, to
>say the least, than a .25; 

I think you're comparing .22LR ballistics from a rifle, with .25ACP
as fired from a short-barreled pistol.  Standard loads from identical
barrel lengths, there's not much difference between the two.

Well, except that the .25, being a rimless centerfire, is much more
expensive and somewhat more reliable.  And that the .22 is sometimes
used in target pistols that gun nuts admire, whereas the .25 is only
used in subcompact weapons that gun nuts despise.


>>>Between .45s and a .32, i know which i'd pick as probable cause of
>>>death.

>>Well, yeah.  Whichever one was aimed by an assassin, rather than hit by
>>dumb luck.

>>The lethality of pistol bullets, or more commonly the lack thereof, has
>>*far* more to do with where the bullet hits, than with how big a bullet
>>it is.  

>Two or three .45 rounds in the body are going to be more lethal than a
>similar number of .32 rounds in equivalent locations.

Only slightly so.  And what makes you think that "equivalent locations" 
is at all a reasonable assumption, when comparing friendly-fire accidents
to assassination attempts?

This being a purely speculative friendly-fire accident, I suppose we can
speculate that the bodyguards managed to accidentally put every round
right through Long's heart, but really, if there's a bullet through 
someone's vital organs, I'd bet it was put there by someone who was
aiming to kill them, than by someone who wasn't.


-- 
*John Schilling                    * "Anything worth doing,         *
*Member:AIAA,NRA,ACLU,SAS,LP       *  is worth doing for money"     *
*Chief Scientist & General Partner *    -13th Rule of Acquisition   *
*White Elephant Research, LLC      * "There is no substitute        *
*John.Schilling@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
     *  for success"                  *
*661-951-9107 or 661-275-6795      *    -58th Rule of Acquisition   *
 




 61 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"louann_m@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-18 11:01:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-18 12:41:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 18:17:33 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-18 15:49:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 22:08:35 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:17:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 23:46:50 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-02-20 00:08:39 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-23 15:45:10 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Howard Brazee <pbrazee  2008-02-20 06:53:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Kurt Busiek <kurt@[EMA  2008-02-20 10:05:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-18 18:07:02 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-19 18:25:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-19 22:47:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-19 22:25:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 02:52:05 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-20 08:17:20 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 13:57:47 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-20 19:14:13 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 20:02:59 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 01:10:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 21:15:03 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 02:59:46 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 22:18:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 03:23:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 22:33:09 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 04:11:00 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 02:06:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 12:09:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 07:38:49 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-21 16:04:56 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Bill Snyder <bsnyder@[  2008-02-21 18:53:44 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-21 04:27:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-21 03:45:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-20 23:18:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 04:33:07 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-20 23:51:54 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 02:05:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Mike Schilling"  2008-02-21 07:21:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 04:37:34 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 12:03:01 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 12:04:42 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 07:37:28 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Gene Ward Smith <gene@  2008-02-21 13:35:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 19:02:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 13:41:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 21:33:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-02-21 21:42:40 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-21 22:05:08 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-02-21 16:36:45 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-21 19:03:21 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 00:31:37 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (D  2008-02-21 20:18:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-02-22 04:49:36 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-22 21:47:25 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-02-22 03:47:12 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
John Schilling <schill  2008-02-22 17:19:32 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-02-23 01:00:18 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"louann_m@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-19 16:24:04 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-02-19 22:08:30 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-02-19 22:37:54 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 1:37:48 CDT 2008.