Re: Not always joking, it seems

Seth wrote:
> In article <uimvj.8568$5K1.6427@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Mike Schilling <mscottschilling@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Wayne Throop" <throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:1203626461@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>> So, you're saying that if you make deterrence cheaper
>>> (in terms of money, time, and bureaucratic hassle),
>>> you'll get more of it, right?
>> But now you're talking about secondary effects.
> 
> Making deterrence cheaper leading to more of it isn't a secondary
> effect any more than making chocolate cheaper leads to more of it
> (being bought and consumed).
> 


I don't buy cheap chocolate - it invariably turns out to be cr*p.

-- 
Jette Goldie
jette@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
("reply to" is spamblocked - use the email addy in sig)