Re: Not always joking, it seems

In article <ddfr-DE4DF7.22455025022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
David Friedman  <ddfr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>In article <fq01ta$hfn$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Seth) 
>wrote:
>> In article <fpq6qs$etn$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> Keith F. Lynch <kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >David Harmon <bad@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>> >> The property won't sell nearly as well with both houses on it.
>> >> It's one or the other.
>> >
>> >There are numerous lots.  And numerous potential customers who can
>> >afford a 65K house but not a 150K house.
>> 
>> As long as there are more who will buy a 150K house than I've built, I
>> don't care how many others there are.
>
>Is there some reason why you are the only person who can build houses? 
>Are there more people who will buy a 150K house than the total of houses 
>that can be built? Why?

No, there aren't.

Once the demand at 150K is satisfied, less-profitable houses will be
built.  But apparently, that hasn't happened yet.

Seth