Re: Not always joking, it seems

In article <Jk_wj.13926$XI.11650@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Jette  <bosslady@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>Seth wrote:

>> Making deterrence cheaper leading to more of it isn't a secondary
>> effect any more than making chocolate cheaper leads to more of it
>> (being bought and consumed).
>
>I don't buy cheap chocolate - it invariably turns out to be cr*p.

If the price of your favorite kind of chocolate dropped (say, a new
store opened up and had a sale on it in order to attract customers),
would you expect people to buy more?

Seth