Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Not always ...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Re: Not always joking, it seems

by "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 27, 2008 at 08:45 PM

Seth <sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Once the demand at 150K is satisfied, less-profitable houses will be
> built.  But apparently, that hasn't happened yet.

Why does it happen in other fields?  There are, for instance,
expensive clothes and cheap clothes available for sale.  And expensive
food and cheap food.  Similarly with almost everything else, except
housing and medical care.
-- 
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html
before emailing me.

142 Posts in Topic:

"Karl M. Syring"

2008-02-16 10:13:22

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Matthias Warkus <Warku

2008-02-19 12:20:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-19 12:12:19

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-19 20:23:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

ted@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T

2008-02-20 01:27:06

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-19 20:46:18

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-20 16:32:19

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-20 09:50:52

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-20 18:05:51

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-20 10:32:04

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Colette Reap <colette@

2008-02-20 20:53:26

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-20 12:55:13

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 20:59:09

Re: Not always joking, it seems

prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-02-21 12:04:00

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 10:08:57

Re: Not always joking, it seems

prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P

2008-02-22 10:59:00

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 13:30:42

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 10:05:27

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 18:32:38

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 16:11:18

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM

2008-02-21 10:17:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 18:40:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 16:24:53

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:34:29

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Colette Reap <colette@

2008-02-22 19:46:06

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-22 13:43:17

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-23 00:07:10

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-22 17:02:11

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-23 00:05:42

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-22 20:47:50

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-22 21:10:59

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-23 13:42:02

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 10:52:47

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-23 14:50:13

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Sean O'Hara <seanohara

2008-02-23 12:54:00

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-27 14:07:11

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-27 22:06:46

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-28 14:07:07

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-28 19:54:45

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-29 17:09:21

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-28 16:31:04

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:33:17

Re: Not always joking, it seems

tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (

2008-02-26 16:23:47

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-27 20:28:43

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Sean O'Hara <seanohara

2008-02-20 17:09:37

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-20 15:10:06

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 13:26:10

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 10:07:01

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 18:38:01

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 16:08:15

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-22 00:35:22

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 13:20:19

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 21:32:23

Re: Not always joking, it seems

mike weber <fairportfa

2008-02-20 21:45:32

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Jay E. Morris"

2008-02-21 02:58:09

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Doug Wickstrom <nimshu

2008-03-06 18:31:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-20 20:15:35

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 21:12:05

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-21 13:37:17

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-21 15:50:13

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:41:25

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-26 15:17:48

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 22:25:23

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-21 17:36:39

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 16:25:35

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:42:16

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-22 22:22:46

Re: Not always joking, it seems

mike weber <fairportfa

2008-02-23 00:52:37

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-23 13:19:16

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Harmon <source@[

2008-02-23 14:22:53

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-23 17:30:52

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:43:38

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-25 22:54:48

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-25 22:45:50

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-27 20:53:24

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-27 20:45:40

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-27 20:43:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-28 20:23:29

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Karl Johanson"

2008-02-28 04:57:31

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-28 20:19:11

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Karl Johanson"

2008-03-01 05:21:36

Re: Not always joking, it seems

justinf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-03-05 16:31:35

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-03-01 03:29:36

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 14:51:53

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-23 22:56:10

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 15:00:44

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-23 23:23:50

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 15:45:04

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-23 23:52:50

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 17:01:51

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-24 09:47:24

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-24 02:22:03

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 03:42:55

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-25 22:51:53

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-27 21:11:16

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 22:40:29

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 00:41:19

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-20 22:57:12

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-02-21 20:50:22

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-22 22:21:46

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Jay E. Morris"

2008-02-21 01:57:07

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"pullo" <pul

2008-02-19 21:56:23

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Mike Schilling"

2008-02-19 19:12:50

Re: Not always joking, it seems

John Schilling <schill

2008-02-20 18:33:10

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Mike Schilling"

2008-02-21 06:01:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"pullo" <pul

2008-02-21 21:22:45

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 21:20:28

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"pullo" <pul

2008-02-24 04:17:48

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-22 21:42:25

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-19 22:48:31

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Tim Merrigan <tppm@[EM

2008-02-20 10:08:30

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-21 17:39:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-21 10:01:56

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Harmon <source@[

2008-02-21 23:19:16

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-22 01:06:40

Re: Not always joking, it seems

winston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-22 10:01:31

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL

2008-02-22 16:16:11

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-22 13:53:57

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Harmon <source@[

2008-02-22 13:46:45

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-26 15:51:21

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-26 10:20:12

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-03-06 03:15:26

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-26 21:48:26

Re: Not always joking, it seems

sethb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-03-01 03:31:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-03-03 21:36:14

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-03-04 03:29:30

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-03-03 21:36:31

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-03-04 11:48:37

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-03-04 21:30:25

Re: Not always joking, it seems

rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE

2008-03-05 03:40:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Kip Williams <kiptw@[E

2008-03-04 08:04:26

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-03-04 10:55:54

Re: Not always joking, it seems

wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-03-06 08:05:28

Re: Not always joking, it seems

"Keith F. Lynch"

2008-02-23 14:06:16

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-23 14:55:46

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Sean O'Hara <seanohara

2008-02-23 18:50:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Howard Brazee <pbrazee

2008-02-19 18:27:22

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-19 22:41:34

Re: Not always joking, it seems

John Schilling <schill

2008-02-19 18:25:03

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-19 22:28:46

Re: Not always joking, it seems

Matthias Warkus <Warku

2008-02-20 18:45:24

Re: Not always joking, it seems

David Friedman <ddfr@[

2008-02-20 10:24:41

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 15:39:10 CDT 2008.