Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: PEX (was R...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 12 of 57 Topic 6406 of 6820
Post > Topic >>

Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)

by Joe Ellis <synthfilker@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 10, 2008 at 05:47 PM

In article <fr2b0d$g3a$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Joe Ellis <synthfilker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> There's no law against trash picking.
> 
> > There is against trespass, theft, and vandalism.
> 
> It's not trespass if it's at the curb, which it was.  It's not theft
> if it had been put out for trash pickup, which it had.  It's not
> vandalism to pick trash up off the ground, which I did.

You miss the point. Copper pipe is a prime theft item these days. It's 
commonly stolen from construction sites, plumber's trucks, and even 
ripped out of new homes, and old houses. ENTIRE STREETS of new 
construction have been stripped of copper plumbing and pipe in a SINGLE 
NIGHT. And YOU have NO WAY to prove that you didn't get it in any one of 
these ways. If, for example, an existing home in your neighborhood was 
broken into and copper pipe stripped from it while the owners were on 
vacation, then that "old copper pipe" you have on your bookshelf can be 
rapidly transformed into something called "evidence"... and given your 
existing record...

You keep claiming you have no faith in the legal system... yet you place 
complete faith in them now, and seem to believe that "of course" they'll 
take you at your word that you didn't steal it. You really HAVEN'T 
learned anything, have you? 

> I also got much of my furniture and electronics from the trash.
> 
> > Got your receipt?
> 
> > Keith, you of ALL people I would think would be wary of even the
> > possibility of the appearance of being in possession of stolen
> > property.  Didn't you learn your lesson the first time?
> 
> There's prudence and there's paranoia.  I do keep grocery receipts
> until I've eaten the food, and receipts for books, CDs, DVDs, and
> durable goods at least a year.  I keep bank account statements, pay
> stubs, and tax returns forever.  Do you think it's reasonable to
> expect anyone to do more?  How many people do even that much?
>
> Obviously, trash doesn't come with receipts.  Nor does anyone expect
> it to.

Again, you miss the point. This has nothing to do with your taxes or 
bank accounts, or even food or CDs. 

Once more, in very simple words so you can understand.

Copper Pipe is a Thief Magnet.

Without regard to the truth of the matter, You Have A Record. Wasn't the 
charge "Posession of Stolen Property" or something similar? How easy is 
it to interpret your possession of this pipe as exactly that? You cannot 
_prove_ that you picked this pipe out of the trash. Even if you can 
convince the police or whoever that you came by it honestly... it's 
probably still a matter of several days of some very uncomfortable 
conversations. 

The biggest factor against you is that YOU LIVE IN AN APARTMENT. You are 
NOT responsible for any kind of repairs, and odds are you're not doing 
any kind of art with it, so you don't really have any clear reason for 
even HAVING the pipe. No, you don't need a permit to own copper pipe...  
but it's another nail in your coffin, so to speak. 

Trying to sell this pipe to someone you don't know and cannot trust 
implicitly would be VERY STUPID. 

Now, you've never impressed me as being stupid. Don't make me revise 
that opinion. 
 
> Maybe the copper pipe was implanted with a secret transmitter, falsely
> reported as stolen, and placed at the curb where someone knew I would
> be walking, in order to entrap me.  The several-years delay since then
> is just so I'll let my guard down.  Maybe it was reported stolen from
> a murder scene, and tonight at 3 am there will be a knock at the door.
> I'll get the electric chair, and the copper pipe will be used to
> complete the circuit.  Sure, that could happen.

Ah, a poor attempt at reductio ad absurdum that completely ignores the 
facts. Again. 

> 
> I'm about a thousand times more worried that someone I trust to let
> into my apartment will plant a gun and some drugs, then report them to
> the police.  And that's not a major worry of mine.  (Though it is a
> bigger worry than that they might simply steal something of mine.)

You need to re-evaluate those odds. 

> I'm prudent, but not totally paranoid.  I'll leave the latter to the
> 9/11 truthers and their ilk.

You know, even paranoids occasionally have real enemies.... and prudent 
people still end up in jail sometimes. 

Why don't you use your local SF contacts and give it to someone you 
trust that's doing some plumbing repairs themselves? You're never going 
to use it in a rental apartment.

-- 
"The Dream is Alive! Music of the Space Shuttles" now available at your 
local filk dealer, at http://cdbaby.com/cd/joeellis,
and as a digital 
download on iTunes at http://preview.tinyurl.com/yd7gns




 57 Posts in Topic:
Re: Not always joking, it seems
dbell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-07 11:28:33 
PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Joe Ellis <synthfilker  2008-03-08 02:58:09 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Jette <bosslady@[EMAIL  2008-03-08 09:40:44 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Joe Ellis <synthfilker  2008-03-08 15:04:47 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-25 23:42:24 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-08 12:58:23 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Karl Johanson"  2008-03-08 19:16:52 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Joe Ellis <synthfilker  2008-03-08 15:00:32 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-08 16:24:06 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Joe Ellis <synthfilker  2008-03-09 04:31:47 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-09 23:47:25 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Joe Ellis <synthfilker  2008-03-10 17:47:36 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-03-10 23:02:20 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
wdstarr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-03-10 21:59:18 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-10 20:19:13 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-25 23:51:44 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-26 00:03:33 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-03-26 08:24:56 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-26 22:27:19 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-03-26 23:04:03 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-25 23:47:32 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-03-10 01:38:43 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-09 22:54:31 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
David Harmon <source@[  2008-03-09 21:25:20 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-10 22:29:11 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
David Harmon <source@[  2008-03-11 13:12:25 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-03-10 18:17:15 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-10 19:59:34 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
rkshullat@[EMAIL PROTECTE  2008-03-11 00:32:13 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-26 00:19:49 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-26 23:18:04 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-27 06:57:02 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-27 21:13:58 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-29 07:35:45 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-29 15:05:03 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-03-30 15:46:11 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-30 16:11:02 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-03-30 21:53:48 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-30 18:31:35 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-03-30 22:32:36 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-30 23:55:29 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-03-31 13:28:20 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-03-31 13:40:20 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-03-31 16:05:55 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-01 23:41:36 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-03-31 13:06:01 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-31 19:05:49 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-03-31 19:40:16 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
Sean O'Hara <seanohara  2008-04-01 13:54:30 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-04-01 12:18:44 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-02 21:14:03 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-01 00:11:29 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-03-12 03:27:36 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-25 23:55:11 
Re: PEX (was Re: Not always joking...)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-03-26 23:26:51 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-03-25 23:08:41 
Re: Not always joking, it seems
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-03-28 16:17:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Tue May 13 18:49:11 CDT 2008.