Mostly I don't waste time on Andre, but this particular bit seemed worth
pointing out.
In article
<e7a74d19-5104-4344-8430-4f07ece77af5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Andre Lieven <andrelieven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > And, its perfectly fine to " ask questions ", where such questions
> > > are really actual questions, and not statements in fig leaf
disguise,
> > > which your " only for motorists " whine was. You earned the
> > > criticism that came your way for 1) being dishonest in that way,
> > > and for 2) inventing a false antagonism between " all fans " and
> > > " only for motorists ".
> >
> > All fans are motorists?
>
> For someone who styles himself as a writer, you are deficient about
> the use and meaning of specific words of the language ( This strongly
> suggests to me that you are a bad writer, when it comes to fiction,
> as well. ).
>
> I specified that Keith Straw Whored into existance a false
> *antagonism*,
> NOT a false *difference*. Duh. Learn to read for comprehension.
>
> > There are no conflicts of interest wrt con
> > location between those who are and those who are not?
Note that you first accused me of various faults on the grounds that I
supposedly confused "difference" and "antagonism," then quoted the
second part of my statement which, added to the first part, made it
clear I wasn't confusing them--the antagonism came from the combination
of difference and conflict of interest.
Presumably, having made a mistake through not bothering to read all of
my post before you started answering it, you thought correcting the
mistake was too much trouble.
--
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/
http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/
Author of _Harald_, a fantasy without magic.
Published by Baen, in bookstores now
|
