Re: Eastercon 2010

In article <rqjou314rbqp5uhjol8kc2d1rgaes83cie@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On  26 Mar 2008 23:06:34 -0400 "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> carved the following into the hard stone of rec.arts.sf.fandom 
> 
> >I thought mine was a reasonable question, and I still do.  What do
> >you think is unreasonable about it?
> 
> It's tone. Rather than simply asking about methods of getting to the
> con for people who don't drive, you accused the concom of being in
> some sort of conspiracy to deprive you of your ability to attend.

I think it requires real effort to extract from what Keith posted an 
accusation of conspiracy. He apparently thought the concom was paying 
less attention to the problem of people without cars than it should. He 
might or might not be correct, but that isn't an accusation of 
conspiracy.

-- 
 http://www.daviddfriedman.com/
http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/
 Author of _Harald_, a fantasy without magic.
 Published by Baen, in bookstores now