Andre Lieven <andrelieven@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 6, 3:42 am, archm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Nate Edel) wrote:
> > Keith F. Lynch <k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > Andre is like that cockroach. I've seldom seen anyone who argues
> > > worse. If you have him killfiled, you missed seeing him cite the
> > > Wikipedia entry on Disclave to prove something to me, not realizing
> > > that I wrote it.
> >
> > I may need to dig that post up, as I do. That said, while I agree
with your
> > general assessment, it's rather uns****ting to encourage him.
>
> So, do you agree with Keith's whine of:
> " Is Philcon intended for all fans, or only for motorists? "
>
> If you do, well... If you don't, agreeing with his attempt to weasel out
> of the slander that he created is, well...
It's not slander at all (nor is it libel.)
As a question, it's marginally provocative, but not significantly so.
That said, I don't have any opinion of whether or not "Philcon [is]
intended
for all fans, or only for motorists."
--
Nate Edel http://www.cubiclehermit.com/
preferred email |
is "nate" at the | "I do have a cause, though. It is obscenity.
posting domain | I'm for it." - prologue to "Smut" by Tom Lehrer
|
