Re: Do you see what i see?

David G. Bell wrote:
> On Wednesday, in article
>      <TbSdnWkBd8oGqGDanZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>      kiptw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 "Kip Williams" wrote:
> 
>> Marcus L. Rowland wrote:
>>  > The first of those is a program called Stereophotomaker (all one
word),
>>  > which I've used many times - quite handy for turning Victorian
stereo
>>  > pairs into the type of picture that works with coloured gl*****. No
>>  > fla****ng I've noticed.
>>
>> I keep red/blue gl***** by the computer, but so far almost every single

>> time I've tried to use it, the image in the red side is far dimmer than

>> the one in the blue side, making me try to squint enough to equalize 
>> them, and invariably fail. I can tell that there's a 3-D effect there, 
>> but can't make it out.
>>
>> I have some of the same problem with printed anaglyphic stereos as
well. 
>> Could just be me, I suppose.
> 
> You maybe ought to check your monitor settings, both colour temperature 
> and the gamma settings for the three primary colours. Monitors do age 
> and drift, and reds could be coming out darker than they should.
> 
> Or it could even be a bad contact on the VGA lead.

Perhaps, but it seems to occur no matte which monitor I use, or which 
setting the monitor is on. Not to mention in print.

Kip W