Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Meaningful SUBJ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 72 Topic 6675 of 7038
Post > Topic >>

Meaningful SUBJECT lines

by fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 20, 2008 at 09:58 PM

I recently subscribed to this group. I suspect I'll shortly
unsubscribe.

Haven't any of you been exposed to the concept of having a SUBJECT
header that matches the discussion? In every other group I've
followed, it's common to find a SUBJECT of the form 
THIS (WAS THAT).

BIG PURPLE DIGIT has traveled to: Gresham's Law; fiscal policy;
coinage; broadcast vs. cable vs. satellite TV, complete with
technical specs; air****t and supermarket carts; unicode;
newsreaders and how they parse URLs; and several subthreads of
humor and puns.

I'VE SEEN THINGS YOU PEOPLE WOULDN'T BELIEVE is an even longer
thread and at least as diverse.

That said, I'll apologize in advance of being asked to. Netiquette
clearly states that newcomers are supposed to accept the existing
standards. In general, I agree. But I don't agree strongly enough
to keep me from sending this post.

I'm sorry to have interrupted. You can to back to discussing ...
whatever it was you were discussing.
 




 72 Posts in Topic:
Meaningful SUBJECT lines
fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 21:58:12 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-20 22:13:40 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 22:13:02 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-21 02:26:42 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 22:52:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-22 00:15:16 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 20:42:19 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-23 00:17:52 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Joy Beeson <jbeeson@[E  2008-04-20 23:55:45 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Evelyn C. Leeper&qu  2008-04-21 09:27:17 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 02:15:54 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-04-20 23:15:57 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:08:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
David Harmon <source@[  2008-04-21 20:09:25 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-20 20:08:10 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 23:33:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:10:26 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:09:55 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-20 20:08:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 23:15:41 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-20 20:27:24 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:12:54 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-04-21 16:10:00 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 12:16:53 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:38:43 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 10:58:04 
Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:50:26 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:23:10 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:03:54 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:03:24 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-22 17:25:46 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-22 21:50:42 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-23 17:13:03 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 03:21:01 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 23:33:47 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-20 20:37:20 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Wim Lewis <wiml@[EMAIL  2008-04-21 06:53:37 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-04-21 16:14:31 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:46:12 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:39:03 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Petrea Mitchell <pravn  2008-04-20 22:12:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:14:01 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Wim Lewis <wiml@[EMAIL  2008-04-26 01:24:24 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Karl Johanson"  2008-04-21 18:42:05 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 15:29:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-21 20:00:57 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 16:25:42 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 20:25:41 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 18:23:51 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:48:40 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:40:36 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 20:44:43 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 01:51:35 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 23:04:44 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:23:59 
Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 23:48:52 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:40:20 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:25:55 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:00:21 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
"Karl Johanson"  2008-04-24 03:29:40 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-23 23:55:10 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:56:33 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:05:46 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 11:56:04 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
winston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 09:51:06 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-23 15:36:28 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-23 19:20:32 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES
archmage@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 16:58:34 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
Joy Beeson <jbeeson@[E  2008-04-22 00:09:43 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:46:52 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
dbell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 09:48:00 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Martha Adams"   2008-04-26 16:00:35 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Wed Jul 9 1:53:15 CDT 2008.