Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Meaningful ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 24 of 72 Topic 6675 of 7348
 Post > Topic >>

Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines

by mike weber <fairportfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 21, 2008 at 12:16 PM

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:10 +0100 (BST), prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Paul
Dormer) wrote:

>In article <048p045r5aem4iipsfpmcjbm5fqgb8a1nh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>fair****tfan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (mike weber) wrote:
>
>> 
>> In some hotels, the stairs only open to the ground floor (or even to
>> outdoors), unless you have a key to open the doors at the individual
>> landings.
>
>There was a Worldcon, and it doesn't seem too long ago in my memory,
>but I can't remember which it was, where the main hotel had stairwells
>that didn't link every floor.  So one stairwell might link the 3rd, 6th,
>9th etc., and another might link the 2nd, 4th, 6th, etc.  I remember
>Mike Scott saying that he was using his D&D skills to work out the best
>routes to get between various party floors.

I think the Anaheim Hilton was like that.




 72 Posts in Topic:
Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 21:58:12 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-20 22:13:40 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 22:13:02 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-21 02:26:42 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 22:52:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-22 00:15:16 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 20:42:19 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-23 00:17:52 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Joy Beeson <jbeeson@[E  2008-04-20 23:55:45 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Evelyn C. Leeper&qu  2008-04-21 09:27:17 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 02:15:54 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-04-20 23:15:57 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:08:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 David Harmon <source@[  2008-04-21 20:09:25 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-20 20:08:10 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 23:33:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:10:26 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:09:55 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-20 20:08:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 23:15:41 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-20 20:27:24 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:12:54 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-04-21 16:10:00 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 12:16:53 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:38:43 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 10:58:04 
Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:50:26 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:23:10 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:03:54 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:03:24 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-22 17:25:46 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-22 21:50:42 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-23 17:13:03 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 03:21:01 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 23:33:47 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-20 20:37:20 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Wim Lewis <wiml@[EMAIL  2008-04-21 06:53:37 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-04-21 16:14:31 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:46:12 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:39:03 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Petrea Mitchell <pravn  2008-04-20 22:12:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:14:01 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Wim Lewis <wiml@[EMAIL  2008-04-26 01:24:24 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Karl Johanson"  2008-04-21 18:42:05 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 15:29:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-21 20:00:57 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 16:25:42 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 20:25:41 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 18:23:51 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:48:40 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:40:36 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 20:44:43 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 01:51:35 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 23:04:44 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:23:59 
Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 23:48:52 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:40:20 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:25:55 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:00:21 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 "Karl Johanson"  2008-04-24 03:29:40 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-23 23:55:10 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:56:33 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:05:46 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 11:56:04 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 winston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 09:51:06 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
 tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-23 15:36:28 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
 Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-23 19:20:32 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES
 archmage@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 16:58:34 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 Joy Beeson <jbeeson@[E  2008-04-22 00:09:43 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:46:52 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 dbell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 09:48:00 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Martha Adams"   2008-04-26 16:00:35 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Tue Oct 7 3:47:41 CDT 2008.