Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines

Jay E. Morris <morrisj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Jay E. Morris <morrisj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> And here I always thought it was our attempt to get into Guiness in
>>> the "Most messages under one subject line" catagory.

>> What is the current record?

> Got to be a way to find that in Google but a quick look doesn't
> revel it.

I'm not convinced that there's a way to find that in Google.  If only
Google offered to sell copies of their entire database so that one
could write one's own programs to play with it.  A couple other things
I'd like to do would be:

* Run Dissociated Press over the entire database.

* Find out what's the smallest positive whole number that's never been
  mentioned on any web page or in any newsgroup posting.

> We'll just make the claim and wait for other the refute it.

What if the other, instead of refuting it, simply calls you a raving
loon engaging in massive projection?
-- 
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html
before emailing me.