Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: Meaningless...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 32 of 72 Topic 6675 of 7348
Post > Topic >>

Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)

by "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 22, 2008 at 09:50 PM

Douglas Berry <penguin_boy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hotels tend to avoid this, in my experience, because stairs can be
> magnets for injuries and the subsequent lawsuits.

If the stairs aren't defective, lawsuits on what grounds?  Being
injured isn't grounds for a lawsuit unless the injury was due to
someone's negligence or malice.

> Elevators tend to open into areas under constant observation and
> traffic.

On the lobby level, maybe half the time.  On the sleeping room levels
and the garage levels, almost never.  Anyhow, since stairways always
let you go down and outside, nothing prevents a thief from going up in
the elevator empty-handed then down the stairs to the outdoors with
his loot.
-- 
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html
before emailing me.
 




 72 Posts in Topic:
Meaningful SUBJECT lines
fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 21:58:12 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-20 22:13:40 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 22:13:02 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-21 02:26:42 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 22:52:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-22 00:15:16 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 20:42:19 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-23 00:17:52 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Joy Beeson <jbeeson@[E  2008-04-20 23:55:45 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Evelyn C. Leeper&qu  2008-04-21 09:27:17 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 02:15:54 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-04-20 23:15:57 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:08:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
David Harmon <source@[  2008-04-21 20:09:25 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-20 20:08:10 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 23:33:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:10:26 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:09:55 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-20 20:08:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 23:15:41 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-20 20:27:24 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:12:54 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-04-21 16:10:00 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 12:16:53 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:38:43 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 10:58:04 
Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:50:26 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:23:10 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:03:54 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:03:24 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-22 17:25:46 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-22 21:50:42 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-23 17:13:03 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 03:21:01 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 23:33:47 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-20 20:37:20 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Wim Lewis <wiml@[EMAIL  2008-04-21 06:53:37 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-04-21 16:14:31 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:46:12 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:39:03 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Petrea Mitchell <pravn  2008-04-20 22:12:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:14:01 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Wim Lewis <wiml@[EMAIL  2008-04-26 01:24:24 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Karl Johanson"  2008-04-21 18:42:05 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 15:29:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-21 20:00:57 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 16:25:42 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 20:25:41 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 18:23:51 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:48:40 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:40:36 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 20:44:43 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 01:51:35 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 23:04:44 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:23:59 
Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 23:48:52 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:40:20 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:25:55 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:00:21 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
"Karl Johanson"  2008-04-24 03:29:40 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
"Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-23 23:55:10 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:56:33 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:05:46 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 11:56:04 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
winston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 09:51:06 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-23 15:36:28 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-23 19:20:32 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES
archmage@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 16:58:34 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
Joy Beeson <jbeeson@[E  2008-04-22 00:09:43 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:46:52 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
dbell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 09:48:00 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
"Martha Adams"   2008-04-26 16:00:35 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Oct 7 3:50:09 CDT 2008.