Re: re spam, sequel to a book I do not intend to name or buy because the publisher is spamming.

In article <VImdneqMGu7v_pPVnZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Doug Wickstrom  <nimshubur@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:38:32 +0000 (UTC), jdnicoll@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>(James Nicoll) wrote:
>
>>In article <MM2dnSJTCszipZPVnZ2dnUVZ_qelnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> <BluePencil@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>Way to go, Marcus.  Only post is possibly the last two hundred not
hawking
>>>watches, sneakers, or enlarged penises -- actually relating to the
>>>introduction of a book, for which some people have been waiting 20+
years --
>>>and you take offense and refer to it as spam.
>>>
>>>Gotta wonder if you know what the root word of "random" is.
>>>
>>>Good luck with regulating what the hundreds of nonparticipating lurkers
get
>>>to see in this group.
>>
>>	I note that you don't sign your name. Out of curiousity, since
>>I can't find any information on your company on line, could you verify
>>that you aren't David Palmer himself? 
>
>Given the peculiar word usage, it could be V*nn* B*nt*.

	It's surprising how many spamming publishers seem to bear a 
heartfelt grudge against the English language. Anyone remember 
Guild of Blades "pressional" approach to attracting writers to 
their fiction line? 
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/users/james_nicoll
http://www.cafepress.com/jdnicoll
(For all your "The problem with
defending the English language [...]" T-shirt, cup and tote-bag needs)