Re: Larry Niven: Terrorize Latinos to Solve Health Care Crisis

"David Friedman" <ddfr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ddfr-D7C18C.08481805052008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article
> <7467cb38-d6e6-4bdb-ba15-024c2d269b6e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "louann_m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <louann_m@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> On May 4, 8:47 pm, David Friedman <d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>> > In article <slrng1sket.6u7....@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> >  d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (David DeLaney) wrote:
>> >
>> > > >That is not a source, that is an assertion.
>> >
>> > > Certainly: I am asserting that we think you're not providing the
link
>> > > because you can't. Prove us wrong. Humiliate us with your awesome 
>> > > skills
>> > > and your superior net-fu. Grind us into the dust by, you know, 
>> > > actually
>> > > _showing_ us where to find this story that so caught your eye, so 
>> > > quickly
>> > > after your previous post, that you had to post back here and tell
us
>> > > about
>> > > it. Make us cry for mercy by smiting us with a URL or other way of
>> > > locating
>> > > it.
>> >
>> > I'm curious. If he does so, will you in fact feel humiliated, 
>> > apologize,
>> > concede online that you were in the wrong?
>>
>> Like a motion to adjourn, a request for a cite is always in order.
>> Getting the requested cite doesn't require cringing and general
>> submissive behavior, but a straightforward "thanks, I appreciate the
>> footnote" is a good reply.
>
> In this case, however, the person not only requested the cite, he
> accused the previous poster of not providing it because it wasn't there,
> pretty clearly implying that the previous poster had lied about his
> source--as you can see from what is quoted above. If you make that sort
> of accusation and it isn't true, you owe a pretty big apology to the one
> accused.

I originally asked for the cite.  I have nowhere said or implied that The 
Other Schilling was lying.

Now, David, do you owe me an apology?