Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Fandom > Re: MEANINGFUL ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 68 of 72 Topic 6675 of 7425
 Post > Topic >>

Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES

by archmage@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nate Edel) May 7, 2008 at 04:58 PM

Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I don't suppose anyone here needs to be told that there's NO
> cholesterol in ANY plant food?

Except in the case of insect-eating plants; I don't know if the plants
contain cholesterol, but their food does :)

-- 
Nate Edel                               http://www.cubiclehermit.com/
 preferred email  | 
 is "nate" at the | "I do have a cause, though. It is obscenity.
 posting domain   |  I'm for it." - prologue to "Smut" by Tom Lehrer




 72 Posts in Topic:
Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 21:58:12 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-20 22:13:40 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 22:13:02 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-21 02:26:42 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 22:52:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-22 00:15:16 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 20:42:19 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Jay E. Morris"  2008-04-23 00:17:52 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Joy Beeson <jbeeson@[E  2008-04-20 23:55:45 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Evelyn C. Leeper&qu  2008-04-21 09:27:17 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 02:15:54 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 David Friedman <ddfr@[  2008-04-20 23:15:57 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:08:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 David Harmon <source@[  2008-04-21 20:09:25 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-20 20:08:10 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 23:33:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:10:26 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:09:55 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-20 20:08:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-20 23:15:41 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-20 20:27:24 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:12:54 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 prd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (P  2008-04-21 16:10:00 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 12:16:53 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:38:43 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 10:58:04 
Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:50:26 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:23:10 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:03:54 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:03:24 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-22 17:25:46 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-22 21:50:42 
Re: Meaningless SUBJECT lines (was Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 Douglas Berry <penguin  2008-04-23 17:13:03 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 03:21:01 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-20 23:33:47 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-20 20:37:20 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Wim Lewis <wiml@[EMAIL  2008-04-21 06:53:37 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Doug Wickstrom <nimshu  2008-04-21 16:14:31 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:46:12 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:39:03 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Petrea Mitchell <pravn  2008-04-20 22:12:56 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 10:14:01 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Wim Lewis <wiml@[EMAIL  2008-04-26 01:24:24 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Karl Johanson"  2008-04-21 18:42:05 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 15:29:46 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-21 20:00:57 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 16:25:42 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 20:25:41 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 18:23:51 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:48:40 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-21 23:40:36 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 20:44:43 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 djheydt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-22 01:51:35 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-21 23:04:44 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-21 23:23:59 
Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 23:48:52 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 fanoid <fanoid@[EMAIL   2008-04-22 00:40:20 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:25:55 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:00:21 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 "Karl Johanson"  2008-04-24 03:29:40 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 "Keith F. Lynch"  2008-04-23 23:55:10 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 08:56:33 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-22 11:05:46 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 Kip Williams <kiptw@[E  2008-04-22 11:56:04 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 winston@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-23 09:51:06 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
 tmcd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (  2008-04-23 15:36:28 
Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (was Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (
 Daniel R. Reitman <dre  2008-04-23 19:20:32 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES
 archmage@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2008-05-07 16:58:34 
Re: MEANINGFUL subject LINES (was: Meaningful SUBJECT lines)
 Joy Beeson <jbeeson@[E  2008-04-22 00:09:43 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 mike weber <fairportfa  2008-04-21 18:46:52 
Re: Meanyful SUbject LINES (was Re: MeAnInGfUl SuBjEcT lInEs (wa
 dbell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-22 09:48:00 
Re: Meaningful SUBJECT lines
 "Martha Adams"   2008-04-26 16:00:35 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 23:10:31 CST 2008.