Re: 3 words: Star Wars Babies

Anybody wrote:
> In article <MPG.21c7dab65878492898b512@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Pete B
> <xxxh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 
>> In article <9cY6j.5161$3s1.1845@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, zeeker518@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Duggy" <Paul.Duggan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>>
news:cde4adff-3b8e-44b7-bf9c-92c1733950af@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Dec 8, 9:25 pm, "Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Chewie: Chewbacca dance!!
>>>> Sorry, this broke me out of it.
>>> It's either that or Star Trek Babies.
>> Why not Star Trek Babes - more potential ;)
> 
> We've already had that show (supposedly) twice. Once with the Seven of
> Nine and once with T'Pol, and both shows are generally considered the
> worst of the Trek franchise.

No what was wrong with  Enterprise and Voyager had to do with bad Star 
Trek, it had nothing to do with pretty women.