Re: CLOVERFIELD (spoilers)

"Thanatos" <atropos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:atropos-55A41F.17410128012008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <08GdnfKiiaRMJADanZ2dnUVZ_o-mnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "Thanatos" <atropos@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:atropos-803A9D.06113128012008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > In article <R_udncFFn-lz5QDanZ2dnUVZ_vGinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>> > "Rick" <videojockey1a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> >> JJ has said that CLover was a creature from the depths of
>> >> the Ocean which is why it's hide was near invulnerable.
>> >
>> > Not sure why something from the bottom of the ocean would
>> > have skin that can repel bunker-buster bombs and munitions
>> > that can penetrate tank armor.
>>
>> Do you know how much PRESSURE exists on the bottom of the ocean?
>
> Yes. Do you know how sea creatures survive it? Doesn't sound like you do
> if you think it's because they have thick skin.

By NOT having air cavities inside. Apparently the Creature did and thus
had 
the armored shell to withstand ocean pressures--and thus armored shells.

-- Ken from Chicago