Re: Paramount Agrees To Two More Trek Movies

In article
<bob-68BECB.20222102022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Warchild
<bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> In article <yzlmyqirbma.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>  cstacy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Christopher C. Stacy) wrote:
> 
> > Anybody <anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> > 
> > > In article <Yv4pj.633$f73.337@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Manco"
> > > <manco_dollars@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Steven L. wrote:
> > >> > At least, we can surmise that from what actor Anton Yelchin just
> > >> > announced:
> > >> > He has signed up to play Chekov in Trek XI, Trek XII and Trek
XIII.
> > >> >
> > >> > http://www.syfyportal.com/news424670.html
> > >> 
> > >> Assuming it's no flop, but from everything I've heard Trek fans are
> > >> going 
> > >> to 
> > >> love this. 
> > >
> > > If it is a silly "reboot" (as some things point to), then nope, real
> > > "Trek" fans will hate it because it will pee all over the already
> > > established history and create a split franchise.
> > >
> > > The "don't really care about 'Star Trek', just as long as it's got
> > > space ships" fans might well love it though.
> > >
> > > Then there are the "slap the words 'Star Trek' onto any old garbage
and
> > > I'll watch it" fans who will literally watch any old garbage with
"Star
> > > Trek" in the title - "Star Trek: Smarter than a fifth grader"
anyone??
> > 
> > Klingon mumification glyph
> 
> I despise you fannish priests of the true religion.  I had to read the 
> same tired shit on the Tolkien groups when the movies were released.  
> 
> You know what? I don't have an opinion about the next Star Trek movie 
> because I HAVEN'T SEEN IT.  Why haven't I seen it?  Because IT DOESN'T 
> EXIST IN A FINISHED FORM.
> 
> That doesn't stop some people, though.  Never seems to stop the ignorant

> from expressing their opinion.

Maybe you should actually READ messages. I have said all along *IF* it
is a silly "remake" and that we don't know for certain yet.