Re: Paramount Agrees To Two More Trek Movies

In article <acmpj.40062$4w.38207@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 "Kweeg" <kweeg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> "Warchild" <bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:bob-B3561A.00161003022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <030220081742515192%anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >  Anybody <anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > In article
> > > <bob-68BECB.20222102022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Warchild
> > > <bob@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <yzlmyqirbma.fsf@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > > >  cstacy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Christopher C. Stacy) wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Anybody <anybody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In article <Yv4pj.633$f73.337@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Manco"
> > > > > > <manco_dollars@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Steven L. wrote:
> > > > > >> > At least, we can surmise that from what actor Anton Yelchin
> just
> > > > > >> > announced:
> > > > > >> > He has signed up to play Chekov in Trek XI, Trek XII and
Trek
> XIII.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > http://www.syfyportal.com/news424670.html
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Assuming it's no flop, but from everything I've heard Trek
fans
> are
> > > > > >> going
> > > > > >> to
> > > > > >> love this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If it is a silly "reboot" (as some things point to), then
nope,
> real
> > > > > > "Trek" fans will hate it because it will pee all over the
already
> > > > > > established history and create a split franchise.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The "don't really care about 'Star Trek', just as long as it's
got
> > > > > > space ships" fans might well love it though.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then there are the "slap the words 'Star Trek' onto any old
> garbage and
> > > > > > I'll watch it" fans who will literally watch any old garbage
with
> "Star
> > > > > > Trek" in the title - "Star Trek: Smarter than a fifth grader"
> anyone??
> > > > >
> > > > > Klingon mumification glyph
> > > >
> > > > I despise you fannish priests of the true religion.  I had to read
the
> > > > same tired shit on the Tolkien groups when the movies were
released.
> > > >
> > > > You know what? I don't have an opinion about the next Star Trek
movie
> > > > because I HAVEN'T SEEN IT.  Why haven't I seen it?  Because IT
DOESN'T
> > > > EXIST IN A FINISHED FORM.
> > > >
> > > > That doesn't stop some people, though.  Never seems to stop the
> ignorant
> > > > from expressing their opinion.
> > >
> > > Maybe you should actually READ messages. I have said all along *IF*
it
> > > is a silly "remake" and that we don't know for certain yet.
> >
> > Since your entire thesis is the 'if it is a silly remake' and "slap
the
> > words Star Trek on it' and it is STILL SUCCESSFUL, then the people who
> > like it are IDIOTS, I will stand by my observation that you have
> > pronounced yourself the only real priest of the the true religion of
> > Star Trek Fandom.
> 
> LOL! Indeed.
> Careful Warchild or Anybody will label you an idiot or moron and smite
you
> to his killfile.
> {{;-/>

One can only hope...