Re: Paramount Agrees To Two More Trek Movies

In article <s2ncq31ufnkm1i2k83nhmufnreeb0jfbk3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Jack Bohn <jackbohn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Which two or three?
> There's the aphorism that "even-numbered Star Trek movies don't
> suck," to which I suggest we could add ST III as perhaps one
> "fans" are more fond of than the general public.  Among the
> unnumbered Star Trek movies, can there be only one?  "First
> Contact" was - I would guess - the biggest money-maker; do "fans"
> reject it for what it's done to the Borg?

And Zephram Cochrane, and World War 3, and the future history of Earth, 
etc. etc. etc.

-- 
Jitterbug phones:
Fourth one is in hand.  Doesn't work.  Again.
Billing is all wrong.  Again.
Avoid at all costs.