In article <05KdnayPBoLIrynanZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Anim8rFSK" <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:ANIM8Rfsk-37C623.21545013022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > In article <1202957908_2368@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Uniblab" <uniblab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I never got why they released so many of the Trek movies in
> >> November/December - I always thought they would do better in the
summer
> >> movie season than at the holidays.
> >
> > I always thought they should have done one every 18 months, and
> > alternated action oriented summer releases with character driven
> > Christmas releases
> >
> > --
> > Star Trek 08:
> >
> > No Shat, No Show.
>
> Wow.
>
> That makes far too much sense.
>
> Sheesh, Fred, that's spectacularly impressive for a movie franchise.
> Alternating character-driven drama with action-packed movie ... that is
> impressive.
>
> -- Ken from Chicago
It seems so obvious, I NEVER understood why they didn't do it. Keep the
sets, make the actors know when they're booked, just enough time between
films for people to do other stuff (on both sides of the camera) and not
get bored.
--
Star Trek 08:
No Shat, No Show.
|
