In article
<ANIM8Rfsk-D390FD.07595014022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <05KdnayPBoLIrynanZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > "Anim8rFSK" <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > news:ANIM8Rfsk-37C623.21545013022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > In article <1202957908_2368@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Uniblab" <uniblab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I never got why they released so many of the Trek movies in
> > >> November/December - I always thought they would do better in the
summer
> > >> movie season than at the holidays.
> > >
> > > I always thought they should have done one every 18 months, and
> > > alternated action oriented summer releases with character driven
> > > Christmas releases
> > >
> > Wow.
> >
> > That makes far too much sense.
> >
> > Sheesh, Fred, that's spectacularly impressive for a movie franchise.
> > Alternating character-driven drama with action-packed movie ... that
is
> > impressive.
> It seems so obvious, I NEVER understood why they didn't do it. Keep the
> sets, make the actors know when they're booked, just enough time between
> films for people to do other stuff (on both sides of the camera) and not
> get bored.
Well, if they had any smarts the studio would have kept introducing new
younger cast members after Wrath of Kahn, keeping the movie series
fresh. But, no, they get rid of both Decker and Ilia in the first film
and toss Saavik aside after a cameo in #4. No planning ahead from the
very beginning...
--
Chris Mack "Refugee, total ****. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
-'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
|
