In article <140220081234169356%invid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Invid Fan <invid@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article
> <ANIM8Rfsk-D390FD.07595014022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> Anim8rFSK <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > In article <05KdnayPBoLIrynanZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> > "Ken from Chicago" <kwicker1b_nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
> > > "Anim8rFSK" <ANIM8Rfsk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > news:ANIM8Rfsk-37C623.21545013022008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > In article <1202957908_2368@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, "Uniblab"
<uniblab@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I never got why they released so many of the Trek movies in
> > > >> November/December - I always thought they would do better in the
summer
> > > >> movie season than at the holidays.
> > > >
> > > > I always thought they should have done one every 18 months, and
> > > > alternated action oriented summer releases with character driven
> > > > Christmas releases
> > > >
> > > Wow.
> > >
> > > That makes far too much sense.
> > >
> > > Sheesh, Fred, that's spectacularly impressive for a movie franchise.
> > > Alternating character-driven drama with action-packed movie ... that
is
> > > impressive.
>
> > It seems so obvious, I NEVER understood why they didn't do it. Keep
the
> > sets, make the actors know when they're booked, just enough time
between
> > films for people to do other stuff (on both sides of the camera) and
not
> > get bored.
>
> Well, if they had any smarts the studio would have kept introducing new
> younger cast members after Wrath of Kahn, keeping the movie series
> fresh. But, no, they get rid of both Decker and Ilia in the first film
> and toss Saavik aside after a cameo in #4. No planning ahead from the
> very beginning...
Actually Saavik shows up again in Star Trek 6, except what's her face
insisted on renaming the character Valeris, pretty much ruining the
entire film.
--
Star Trek 08:
No Shat, No Show.
|
