Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Reviews (M) > Review: Harry P...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 272 of 388
Post > Topic >>

Review: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)

by Ryan Ellis <flickershows@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 21, 2004 at 07:18 PM

Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban
by Ryan Ellis
June 17, 2004

If star ratings mean anything, I've given all 3 'Harry Potter' movies the 
same grade---***. While I've enjoyed this series about a boy wizard and
get 
a kick out of the world J.K. Rowling has created with her books, I still 
feel detached from the entire enterprise. Maybe you DO have to read the 
novels to really love the flicks. Then again, I haven't read a single 
syllable authored by J.R.R. Tolkien either, but the films of his 'LOTR' 
threepack are amazing and I'll be enjoying them for years to come. I'm
more 
of a 'Star Wars' guy anyway, but I DO love the Hobbits almost as much as
the 
Rebels. I guess I'm just not a Potterphile.

In 'Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban', Harry (Daniel Radcliffe, in

his 3rd consecutive outing as the child wiz) and his best buddies (Ron and

Hermione, played as always by Rupert Grint and Emma Watson) are entering 
their 3rd year at the ol' haven for witchcraft, Hogwarts. Harry is 
struggling with adolescence. His fragile emotions are wrung out even more 
when he learns that a long-ago acquaintance of his dead parents, Sirious 
Black (the scraggly Gary Oldman), has escaped from the Azkaban pokey. 
Sirious was sent away for killing the Potterfamilias, so is Harry in
mortal 
danger from someone other than Voldemort now? Harry's like Bart Simpson. 
He's only a kid, but he's already got 2 arch enemies. And we're off! Most
of 
the other beloved characters are back, although Richard Harris' death
opened 
up the role of Dumbledore for Michael Gambon (who plays it droll and 
mischievous). Everyone seems to be having a ball playing a part in this 
universe.

Hollywood doesn't really deserve to be slammed for its lack of imagination

anymore because its become a town that doesn't usually aspire to be 
imaginative in the first place. One big round of applause should go to
these 
'Potter' films then, for taking the kids' fantasy genre almost to "we're
not 
in Kansas anymore" heights. And despite the surprisingly mature themes,
all 
family members can appreciate the Potterverse together. Are these movies 
strictly for kids? A friend of mine has refused to see any of them because

he says it's just a big marketing campaign. It IS that, but we're supposed

to concentrate on what's on screen---not the display tables at toy 
stores---when we're in the theatre. And the on-screen product is good.
It's 
exciting. We discover strange new creatures, we renew acquaintances, arch 
our backs at the appearance of old rivals, and we get to see first-rate 
visual F/X that enhance the story, rather than the other way around.

Although Oldman, Gambon, Emma Thompson, and a few other adult thespians
have 
received major press for their rather-limited participation here, they 
really are just glorified guest stars. Radcliffe, Watson, and Grint own
this 
movie and each one is blossoming into a capable actor. For all the talk of

feminist movie characters, Hermione Granger is becoming THE
tough-but-sweet 
go-to feminist. Watson is the unsung hero of this cast, just as Herminone
is 
the unsung hero at Hogwarts. Perhaps that's all a credit to the female 
novelist, but the filmmakers have continually shown a balanced sense of
how 
much to push Watson without zooming her right past Radcliffe. The
threesome 
work best AS a threesome, though. No matter where books/films 4, 5, 6, up
to 
infinity take us, it's satisfying that Ron & Hermione continue to be 
original characters who could exist in their own story, not just as 
sidekicks to Dirty Harry.

By the time we arrive at the time-travel climax and see all sorts of
angles 
of one key development near a crazy limbs-akimbo tree, the 3 main
characters 
have bonded further and learned some hard truths about overcoming fear. 
There's also a touching message about how some friends always remain
loyal, 
even if it seems they've jumped to the ship o' villainy. These themes
carry 
over nicely to the big screen. Steven Kloves is the screenwriter once
again 
while Alfonso Cuaron takes over the directing ballcap from Chris Columbus 
(who stayed on to produce). Cuaron (director of the kid-not-friendly 'Y Tu

Mama Tambien') has a gifted sense of story and movie magic. I think he 
tipped his hand with the paradoxical climax (I guessed correctly about who

did what to whom), but he fits a lot of material into the film without 
jamming it to the gills. Columbus was accused of being too faithful to the

first two books. Apparently, this one's more original.

You're damned either way (some fans want word-for-word, others want 
something different from what's in Rowling's immense novels), but I
applaud 
Warner Brothers for allowing one of their cash cows to go in such dark 
directions. The harder edge begins early and it doesn't let up very often.

Harry uses magic outside of school, which is a no-no, and puts an arrogant

woman in big, fat danger to boot. Later, a bizarre, goodnatured beast
called 
Buckbeak the hippogriff faces execution. Werewolfs of various shapes and 
dispositions appear on the scene at inopportune times. And we get several 
glimpses of the wicked dementors, the ghostly guards of Azkaban who are 
searching for Sirius Black. Death is discussed often in this movie and
Harry 
& his friends must encounter many different kinds of grim reapers.

'Harry Potter And The Prisoner Of Azkaban' will make dumptrucks full of 
money and audiences the world over are going to see this one more than
once. 
As for me, one viewing of each film has been enough. I get the message and

try to appreciate the metaphors. The F/X are not absolutely seamless, but 
fantasy films shouldn't try to pretend everything is real anyway. If you 
want verisimilitude, go rent some old Sam Fuller or John Cassevetes
flicks. 
Then again, if you want state-of-the-art in modern movie magic, you rent
or 
buy Peter Jackson's 'LOTR' tril. Enough comparisons, though. Harry is 
growing into a man now and he can stand on his own two feet...with or 
without magic. This is a rock-solid entry in the 'Harry Potter' brand. It 
didn't change my life, but it's a satisfying movie. I hold out hope
they'll 
put something together to win me over completely to the vast world of
young 
master Potter.

To work your magic on my Muggle butt, write to flickershows@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
check out my website at http://groups.msn.com/TheMovieFiend.

==========
X-RAMR-ID: 38065
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1291197
X-RT-TitleID: 1132921
X-RT-AuthorID: 1446




 1 Posts in Topic:
Review: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)
Ryan Ellis <flickersho  2004-06-21 19:18:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri May 16 23:06:54 CDT 2008.