Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Reviews (M) > Review: Day Aft...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 278 of 388
Post > Topic >>

Review: Day After Tomorrow, The (2004)

by Ryan Ellis <flickershows@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 22, 2004 at 06:59 PM

The Day After Tomorrow
written in acid by Ryan Ellis
June 21, 2004

Roland Emmerich is a "cheap gasp" director. He'll resort to any shock
tactic 
to make the audience gasp. This is the hack who blew up the White House, 
dinobliterated Madison Square Garden, and now tornadoes the Hollywood
sign. 
Many people might not think those historical sites are sacred, but
Emmerich 
knows he's touching a nerve when he attacks such beloved landmarks. He's
not 
a subtle or cerebral director, but there's room for this guy in
Tinseltown. 
He makes money. 'Independence Day' and 'The Patriot' are in the
unpublished 
movie dictionary under "guilty pleasures that made enough greenbacks to
buy 
the Yankees". 'The Day After Tomorrow' will not be in that same fictitious

dictionary. This movie should be flushed down the hopper like so much
Irwin 
Allen nonsense.

The disaster flick didn't die after 9/11---as some windbags insisted would

happen---it just got a whole lot stupider. Yeah, baby, we still lust for 
destruction, mayhem, and even ultra-violent death in our movies. It helps
if 
an aging heartthrob named Dennis Quaid and a young girl-getter named Jake 
Gyllenhaal are the stars of the delirium. They play a feuding father and 
son, Jack and Sam Hall. Boy-genius Sam treks to the Big Bad Apple on a
class 
trip with his fellow smarty-pantses while climatologist Jack has
discovered 
that the weather is getting screwy and our on-going environmental rape-job

is a factor. The Dick Cheney VP character (spitting image of the cyborg 
himself, but it's really Kenneth Welsh) refuses to listen to what weather 
mishaps might happen down the road. A paraphrased line of 
dialogue---"there's no time to look at pretty clouds when money is out
there 
waiting to be made and/or embezzled." Anyway, against all science, Hall's 
predictions start happening immediately. Days later, the entire northern 
hemisphere is facing a deep freeze. Right.

Sam and his friends are trapped in a New York library when the Atlantic 
Ocean makes an uninvited guest appearance on Manhattan's streets. Tankers 
float down the block (another GASP! moment) and it starts to get chilly. 
Sample dialogue from a phone conversation between Sam & Jack. "Don't go 
outside because the temperatures are plummeting and you'll freeze to
death. 
Stay where you are, and I'll come and get you. What? How will I survive
when 
I just said that the cold will kill anyone who goes out in it? Because I'm

Dennis Quaid and they can't kill me off, unless it's the final scene. Even

then, I think I'll be riding off into the sunset. So you'll be safe until 
then." Okay, I ad-libbed the last 4 or 5 sentences, but you get the idea. 
Sure, he's a climate expert who's spent time in the cold, but COME ON!

The movie actually works for a very---very---short while. While I thought 
the F/X were sorta sad for a flick with a budget the size of Neptune, the 
poster shot of the Statue of Liberty engulfed in a tidal wave and later 
buried under snow is eye-catching. But hype can't always sell tripe. The 
actors don't seem to want to be doing this movie. Quaid and Gyllenhaal
have 
been more interesting while standing on red carpets than they are wading 
through this seepage. I'd love to see the looks on their faces when they
saw 
the final cut. "Do I really look THAT stupid?" If they're bored, do they 
expect us to manufacture some excitement for them? The CG budget must have

left no room for high-priced stars because---as much as I usually like
those 
2 actors---they're not headliners who can open just any old movie.

I wonder if Ian Holm heard that Gyllenhaal had signed on before agreeing
to 
pander. I suspect our buddy Bilbo Baggins assumed he was making 'Donnie 
Darko 2: Frank Freezes The World' and said, "Me too!" Why else would the 
classy Holm spend even 5 minutes on such a production, even if he does
phone 
in his performance and he's always crammed into a tiny set that might as 
well be its own movie? [Same goes for the mature-but-***y Sela Ward and
her 
thankless part as Quaid's doctor wife.] In fact, that reminds me of just
how 
cramped most of the scenes are. Sure, the weather freak-outs happen in 
computer-generated outdoor settings, but it felt like the theatre's
ceiling 
was bearing down on me through most of the movie. Then again, theatres in 
Toronto have been known to collapse without warning, so maybe I'm not 
Chicken Little and the sky really WAS falling. Phew, thank God I didn't
die 
while watching this drivel. I'd end up in movie purgatory.

So let me explain why I'm skull-****ing 'The Day After Tomorrow'. The
first 
2/3rds are probably not that much worse than anything else Emmerich has
made 
with his writing/producing partner Dean Devlin (who's AWOL here, a genius 
move). Stuff is breaking, people are dying, melodramatic near-death
moments 
happen to the leading characters, and we're headed for a showdown between 
the survivors and that vindictive ***** Mother Nature. Eye-rolls were kept

to a relative minimum for about an hour. But then came the wolves. In a 
chase scene apropos of nothing, Gyllenhaal and 2 suckers have to dodge
some 
digital wolves, who escaped from a zoo and ride the subway to NYC. When
you 
already have a global disaster movie on your hands, do you really need to 
add fake drama? I mean, WOLVES? And how did a couple of limping teenagers 
outrun a cold breeze in the big climax? You even see the insta-freeze 
chasing them! I laughed. I laughed long and I laughed hard.

It bugs me to no end that movies like this undercut the environmental 
movement. The picture tries to stand for something, but it makes its case
so 
badly that not even those of us who enjoy breathing moderately clean air
can 
take it seriously. If I had been sitting beside Dubya while watching this,

I'd feel pretty sheepish. He'd be scarfing a pretzel and grinning about
how 
preposterous the anti-oil liberal message really is. After I explained to 
him what "preposterous" and "is" mean, what else could I do but agree that

we recyclers must be full of baloney (or full of some sort of meatlike
****k 
product). If 'The Day After Tomorrow' is right, then I MUST be wrong. The 
"let's save the planet or it'll kill us...like, tomorrow" message is a 
sledgehammer for those who need to be sledged...and it's a kick in the
balls 
for those of us who want to play ball. For the record: if such
catastrophic 
events ever did happen, I think Mexico would tell Americans to **** off.
Or 
they'd at least say, "you gringos ain't comin' HERE! You don't want our 
wetbacks, so we don't want yours!"

Since Roland Emmerich loves to wave the American flag so much, I thought
I'd 
resort to suck-up patriotism too. Here now is 'The Day After Tomorrow' 
version of the American National Anthem, the ol' "Star Spangled Banner". 
Sing with me:

Oh say can you see, through a hack's empty mind.
What so proudly he sold as a weather flick about the cold.
With huge budget and F/X, and the plot gears that grind.
On the big screens we watched, bought tickets like we were told.
And Emmerich's pointless flare, tornadoes whipping up the air,
Gave proof to the smart that our brains were not there.
Oh say do such stupid films like these still work...
On the crowds of naive who cheer this **** like jerks?

To add to the lambasting, write to flickershows@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 And check out

my website at http://groups.msn.com/TheMovieFiend.

==========
X-RAMR-ID: 38092
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1291380
X-RT-TitleID: 1132625
X-RT-AuthorID: 1446
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Review: Day After Tomorrow, The (2004)
Ryan Ellis <flickersho  2004-06-22 18:59:34 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Oct 12 2:12:49 CDT 2008.