Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Reviews (M) > Review: Alien V...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 335 of 388
Post > Topic >>

Review: Alien Vs. Predator (2004)

by Ryan Ellis <flickershows@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 19, 2004 at 06:37 PM

Alien vs. Predator
reviewed by Ryan Ellis
August 17, 2004

My Tagline---Careful...it's rated PG-13 for "slime"

According to scuttlebutt, this crossover project has been in the works
since 
the dawn of time. I guess it took that long just to get the script up to
the 
level of cruddy absurdity. In any cae, the alien is finally making things 
slimy & gooey for the invisible hunters. If you've been following the
"AvP" 
storyline in comics and video games, this movie might be a thing of 
salivation-inducing proportions. What about those of us who enjoyed only 3

of the previous 6 'Alien' and 'Predator' movies and weren't jonesin' for a
1 
on 1? Is there any reason for a non-fan to ante up bucks for 'Alien vs. 
Predator'? No bloody way, Jose.

This flick takes place in the modern-day Antarctic wilderness (all the 
better to isolate the characters and remind us of John Carpenter's 
creepfest, 'The Thing'). Actors who will work for scale have travelled to 
find an ancient pyramid buried under the ice. Little do they know that 
Ripley's futuristic nemesis is down there, dying to lay some eggs and
attach 
some face-huggers on as many human hosts as possible. Also, the predators 
have returned from a century-long outer space vacation to play a 
shades-of-gray role in this fiasco. The human adventurers are caught in
the 
middle of an extraterrestrial battle...which might look and sound like
fun, 
but the whole project makes as much sense as Mush Mouth from "Fat Albert".

I dumbed the story down a bit there, but that's deliberate. It would help 
you to shut your brain down if you go see this movie. I could barely
follow 
the story anyway, partly because I was busy aging a few years while
waiting 
for either the aliens or the predators to show up. For some reason, 
writer/director Paul W.S. Anderson ('Resident Evil') thinks it's a good
idea 
to go 30 minutes before bringing the headliners into the mix. That means 
we've got way too much time to spend with minimum-wage actors you've never

heard of before (except for Sanaa Lathan and Lance Henriksen, who get the 
most screen time). Since a dozen producers and lots of special F/X had to
be 
paid for, there must not have been enough money left to sign bigger names.

It's not really the actors' fault, though. Brando, Newman, and Streep 
couldn't do anything with this idiocy either.

Henriksen---who should form a singing group with Kris Kristofferson and
Sam 
Elliot called "The Rasps"---is Charles Bishop Weyland. You might remember 
Bishop was the heroic android in 'Aliens'. Weyland is co-owner of the 
company that wanted to use the alien as a military weapon in the original 
series. [But isn't the 'Alien' story set in the the distant future while
the 
predator is a bad guy in our modern times? Head hurts...]. Anderson blows 
this juicy opportunity to let us into Henriksen's head. Casual fans won't 
even recognize the Weyland name anyway. This non-issue is one of the
biggest 
disappointments in the entire movie. When I heard ol' Bishop was in the 
cast, I expected some back-story detail about Weyland's role in this
entire 
alien invasion. Instead, he's a rich guy hiking in the snow to be just 
another target in the alien/predator grudge match. What a waste.

Anderson knows nothing about pacing. You have to wait a while for things
to 
happen in Ridley Scott's 'Alien' too, of course, but the characters are 
interesting and you don't really know where the story is going in the
first 
place. There are no secrets worth waiting for in 'AvP', so the opening 
sequences with nary a baddie in sight are just going to put you to sleep. 
Forty-five minutes of dull-ass boredom doesn't offset about 45 minutes of 
moderately entertaining action. Anderson's script takes the highlights of 
the previous films and brings nothing new to this combo of 2 classic 
creatures. As in 2003's horror crossover, 'Freddy vs. Jason', the
climactic 
battle IS nifty. If 'FvJ' was a dead teenager movie with too much teenager

and not enough dead, 'AvP' is the same thing...with adults.

The title characters themselves haven't changed much since their debuts in

1979 and 1987, respectively. The alien was made for the computer F/X age.
We 
get plenty of chances to see the warrior aliens (and, eventually, the 
enormous queen) skitter around in full view. However, brief glimpses of
the 
shark in 'Jaws', Freddy Krueger, and the alien were always far more 
terrifying than the extended look you got in the sequels. Your imagination

can fill in the scary blanks that no filmmaker can...certainly not the 
below-average director at the helm of this sinking ship. At least Anderson

can't be accused of racism or sexism. His movie is very politically
correct. 
The white guys are quickly killed while the black chick gets to try on the

hero hat.

The first two 'Alien' movies were better than the only two 'Predator' 
movies, but I always thought the predator was a cooler beast. He (well, 
there's more than one of him...and maybe none of them are even a "him") is

the most sympathetic character in the picture. I doubt that you'll have
much 
sympathy for the people, though. Most audiences will wind up rooting for 
BOTH bad guys, not for the human bait. While I can understand why mankind 
would side with the dreadlocked preds over the slimy duct-lovers, the 
predator's tweener role is too convenient.

Have I explained the plot sufficiently here? Probably not, but cut me some

slack. I was distracted by thoughts such as, "When will Darth Vader, John 
McClane, Wolverine, and other 20th Century Fox icons show up?" Oh, cripes,
I 
just gave movie executives an idea. [NOTE: Movie execs + idea = never.] 
'AvP's big box office take on opening weekend ensures they're already 
planning 'AvP2', no matter what any wise-ass critic has to say. Hollywood 
doesn't seem to care that they're ruining what we loved about the original

thrillers with these "versus" movies. One good perversion deserves
another.

To shout this way, write to flickershows@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 down my website at http://groups.msn.com/TheMovieFiend

==========
X-RAMR-ID: 38487
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1310973
X-RT-TitleID: 1134655
X-RT-AuthorID: 1446




 1 Posts in Topic:
Review: Alien Vs. Predator (2004)
Ryan Ellis <flickersho  2004-08-19 18:37:02 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri May 9 16:29:03 CDT 2008.