"Howard Brazee" <howard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:b0lon3t7cf37d9hbc6j5apv71me4cf4p8d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:38:53 GMT, throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Wayne Throop)
> wrote:
>
>>Sometimes it's convenient to do that, but in this case it seems largely
>>INconvenient, especially since "X is magic" and "Y is science", as a
>>language
>>usage, doesn't mention "to whom" at all. Hence, misleading,
inconvenient,
>>less-than-useful, etc, etc. IMO.
>
> But if most everybody agrees that witches are magic and TVs are
> science, we should work with their language.
I agree. "Traditional" magic is defined by the "mainstream" that way.
-- Ken from Chicago
|
