Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: anachronism...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 32 of 41 Topic 3302 of 3639
Post > Topic >>

Re: anachronisms?

by nebusj-@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Nebus) Jan 15, 2008 at 11:21 AM

Dr J R Stockton <jrs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:

>In rec.arts.sf.science message <MPG.21f47b66805150ba98973b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Sun,
>13 Jan 2008 19:48:31, bernardZ <BernardZ@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> posted:
>>
>>In the days of sailing ****ps to navigate you used dead reckoning. It was
>>accurate.

>Rubbish.  <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloudesley_Shovell>.

	Well, okay, so they didn't have the longitude right, they didn't 
have the latitude right, the islands weren't mapped right, and the 
comp***** were absurdly defective and almost never would two agree on 
what direction was what.  Does that necessarily make a navigation method 
'inaccurate'?  

-- 
								Joseph Nebus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 




 41 Posts in Topic:
anachronisms?
bealoid <signup@[EMAIL  2008-01-12 11:05:33 
Re: anachronisms?
John Schilling <schill  2008-01-12 07:07:49 
Re: anachronisms?
mcv <mcvmcv@[EMAIL PRO  2008-01-12 21:11:47 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardZ <BernardZ@[EM  2008-01-13 19:48:31 
Re: anachronisms?
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-01-13 01:48:56 
Re: anachronisms?
Steve Hix <sehix@[EMAI  2008-01-13 10:52:36 
Re: anachronisms?
mcv <mcvmcv@[EMAIL PRO  2008-01-14 07:57:57 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-13 16:45:42 
Re: anachronisms?
John Schilling <schill  2008-01-15 16:55:12 
Re: anachronisms?
nebusj-@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-14 08:39:06 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-14 14:50:57 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-15 21:46:50 
Re: anachronisms?
John Schilling <schill  2008-01-16 17:34:13 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardZ <BernardZ@[EM  2008-01-17 20:43:02 
Re: anachronisms?
John Schilling <schill  2008-01-17 17:54:26 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-15 21:48:24 
Re: anachronisms?
James Burns <burns.87@  2008-01-16 11:26:30 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-16 15:13:32 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-16 15:12:36 
Re: anachronisms?
John <themasterJ@[EMAI  2008-01-17 15:59:20 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-17 21:05:37 
Re: anachronisms?
Wildepad <noreplies>  2008-01-12 17:08:29 
Re: anachronisms?
wrosecrans <wrosecrans  2008-01-12 15:47:04 
Re: anachronisms?
Eivind Kjorstad <eivin  2008-01-15 06:42:36 
Re: anachronisms?
David Johnston <david@  2008-01-15 07:15:38 
Re: anachronisms?
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-13 19:48:23 
Re: anachronisms?
Steve Hix <sehix@[EMAI  2008-01-13 17:20:31 
Re: anachronisms?
Samuel Penn <sam@[EMAI  2008-01-13 21:18:01 
Re: anachronisms?
Dr J R Stockton <jrs@[  2008-01-14 19:36:25 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardZ <BernardZ@[EM  2008-01-15 21:00:34 
Re: anachronisms?
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-01-15 03:02:20 
Re: anachronisms?
nebusj-@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-15 11:21:20 
Re: anachronisms?
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-14 23:53:37 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardZ <BernardZ@[EM  2008-01-15 20:52:14 
Re: anachronisms?
David Johnston <david@  2008-01-15 07:12:27 
Re: anachronisms?
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-01-15 03:01:00 
Re: anachronisms?
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-16 01:13:49 
Re: anachronisms?
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-16 07:20:28 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardZ <BernardZ@[EM  2008-01-16 23:25:13 
Re: anachronisms?
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-01-16 10:55:13 
Re: anachronisms?
Dr J R Stockton <jrs@[  2008-01-18 22:05:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 16:14:06 CDT 2008.