Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: anachronism...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 18 of 41 Topic 3302 of 3639
Post > Topic >>

Re: anachronisms?

by bernardz <bernardz@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 16, 2008 at 03:13 PM

On Jan 17, 3:26 am, James Burns <burns...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> bernardzwrote:
> > On Jan 16, 12:13 pm, thro...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Wayne Throop) wrote:
>
> >>that you can only measure "speed and direction" wrt the ocean surface.
> >>The difficulty (*amongst* our many difficulties) is that there are
ocean=

> >>currents, which can displace you an unknown distance and direction of
> >>tens or hundreds of kilometers per day.
>
> >>Now sure, if you've charted all the mid-ocean currents you can maybe
> >>correct for some of that.  But there's a boostrapping problem.
>
> > If you read the article I quoted you can see that Columbus took that
> > into account  in an area he knew nothing about.
>
> >>And a fanatical devotion to the pope.
> > ???
>
> > Please explain
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spanish_Inquisition_%28Monty_Python%29
> : After entering, the Inquisition frequently got bogged down
> : in recitations of their weapons ("Amongst our weaponry are
> : such diverse elements as fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency,
> : an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope, and nice red
> : uniforms!"). Xim=E9nez would state the number of weapons they
> : had ("Our two/three/four weapons are..."), then list one more
> : than he had counted, then start again using a higher number.
> : After several attempts, Xim=E9nez would state, "I'll come in
> : again...", and herd The Inquisition back off the set. The
> : straight man would then deliver the cue line again, the
> : Inquisition would burst back in (complete with jarring chord),
> : and the introduction tried again. This was repeated two or three
> : times before Xim=E9nez gave up and moved on.
>
> HTH


And the significance of this comment to the discussion?
 




 41 Posts in Topic:
anachronisms?
bealoid <signup@[EMAIL  2008-01-12 11:05:33 
Re: anachronisms?
John Schilling <schill  2008-01-12 07:07:49 
Re: anachronisms?
mcv <mcvmcv@[EMAIL PRO  2008-01-12 21:11:47 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardZ <BernardZ@[EM  2008-01-13 19:48:31 
Re: anachronisms?
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-01-13 01:48:56 
Re: anachronisms?
Steve Hix <sehix@[EMAI  2008-01-13 10:52:36 
Re: anachronisms?
mcv <mcvmcv@[EMAIL PRO  2008-01-14 07:57:57 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-13 16:45:42 
Re: anachronisms?
John Schilling <schill  2008-01-15 16:55:12 
Re: anachronisms?
nebusj-@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-14 08:39:06 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-14 14:50:57 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-15 21:46:50 
Re: anachronisms?
John Schilling <schill  2008-01-16 17:34:13 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardZ <BernardZ@[EM  2008-01-17 20:43:02 
Re: anachronisms?
John Schilling <schill  2008-01-17 17:54:26 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-15 21:48:24 
Re: anachronisms?
James Burns <burns.87@  2008-01-16 11:26:30 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-16 15:13:32 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-16 15:12:36 
Re: anachronisms?
John <themasterJ@[EMAI  2008-01-17 15:59:20 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardz <bernardz@[EM  2008-01-17 21:05:37 
Re: anachronisms?
Wildepad <noreplies>  2008-01-12 17:08:29 
Re: anachronisms?
wrosecrans <wrosecrans  2008-01-12 15:47:04 
Re: anachronisms?
Eivind Kjorstad <eivin  2008-01-15 06:42:36 
Re: anachronisms?
David Johnston <david@  2008-01-15 07:15:38 
Re: anachronisms?
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-13 19:48:23 
Re: anachronisms?
Steve Hix <sehix@[EMAI  2008-01-13 17:20:31 
Re: anachronisms?
Samuel Penn <sam@[EMAI  2008-01-13 21:18:01 
Re: anachronisms?
Dr J R Stockton <jrs@[  2008-01-14 19:36:25 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardZ <BernardZ@[EM  2008-01-15 21:00:34 
Re: anachronisms?
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-01-15 03:02:20 
Re: anachronisms?
nebusj-@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-15 11:21:20 
Re: anachronisms?
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-14 23:53:37 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardZ <BernardZ@[EM  2008-01-15 20:52:14 
Re: anachronisms?
David Johnston <david@  2008-01-15 07:12:27 
Re: anachronisms?
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-01-15 03:01:00 
Re: anachronisms?
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-16 01:13:49 
Re: anachronisms?
throopw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-16 07:20:28 
Re: anachronisms?
bernardZ <BernardZ@[EM  2008-01-16 23:25:13 
Re: anachronisms?
Michael Ash <mike@[EMA  2008-01-16 10:55:13 
Re: anachronisms?
Dr J R Stockton <jrs@[  2008-01-18 22:05:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 16:13:08 CDT 2008.