Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Cloverfield (sp...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 10 Topic 3324 of 3605
Post > Topic >>

Cloverfield (spoilers?) - the monster (strength of materials)

by rblazek@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jan 25, 2008 at 12:06 AM

Hello all from a long time lurker...

After watching Cloverfield, I got to wondering.

As a thought experiment, consider .........

************* spoliler warning ? *************



























You have a monster rampaging through 
New York, the size of a small skyscraper, with the strength to
not only move around speedily but smash through anything in its
way. And not only that, but shrug off land and air launched missles,
tank rounds, and conventional bombs without observable damage.
                                                      
Now any earthly animal would die long, long, long before reaching
that size.  Today's elephants are the current large land mammal,
the megafauna of the ice age, and the dinosaurs show the upper
limits of what is possible with terrestrial biology and materials.

Based on the monster's observed size and movements, can there
be any calculation as to the strength of materials neccessary
to sup****t and move such a creature? This calculation
would have to apply to bones, muscles, skin and all other bodily tissues.
A superstrong skeleton without corresponding musculature and other tissues
would just lead to a skyscraper of meat - a immobile and non-viable
creature.

The only earthly materials that I believe could even measure up would be
carbon nanotubes (the magical material de jour), but even they might not
suffice for a creature of this size and performance.

So given the above, you have a creature whose entire body from the
cellular level up is built from (forex) carbon nanotubes or an equivalent
material. Such a creature might even be able to shrug off a nuclear blast
(depending on the size of the bomb).

Any ideas or theories?

Thanks in advance...
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
Cloverfield (spoilers?) - the monster (strength of materials)
rblazek@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-01-25 00:06:09 
Re: Cloverfield (spoilers?) - the monster (strength of materials
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-01-24 16:24:05 
Re: Cloverfield (spoilers?) - the monster (strength of materials
Andrew Plotkin <erkyra  2008-01-25 19:49:50 
Re: Cloverfield (spoilers?) - the monster (strength of materials
ErictheTolle@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-01-25 10:05:48 
Re: Cloverfield (spoilers?) - the monster (strength of materials
Braxx <braxx@[EMAIL PR  2008-01-28 18:39:30 
Re: Cloverfield (spoilers?) - the monster (strength of materials
Jack Tingle <wjtingle@  2008-01-29 17:15:49 
Re: Cloverfield (spoilers?) - the monster (strength of materials
Robert Martinu <invali  2008-01-30 02:39:19 
Re: Cloverfield (spoilers?) - the monster (strength of materials
Jack Tingle <wjtingle@  2008-01-29 22:11:18 
Re: Cloverfield (spoilers?) - the monster (strength of materials
Robert Martinu <invali  2008-01-30 05:03:34 
Re: Cloverfield (spoilers?) - the monster (strength of materials
John Schilling <schill  2008-01-30 18:53:20 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Wed Jul 9 2:08:34 CDT 2008.