Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: Atomic bug ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 11 Topic 3327 of 3605
Post > Topic >>

Re: Atomic bug bomb!

by WaltBJ <waltbj01@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jan 26, 2008 at 03:53 PM

On Jan 26, 4:03 pm, Logan Kearsley <chronosur...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jan 26, 1:13 pm, Damien Valentine <valen...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > In my latest work (which will probably be thrown into the bottom of my
> > file drawer along with my previous works), Our Hero discovers a
> > Mysterious Alien Artifact that, once activated, emits a blast of
> > radiation that sterilizes the entire Planet of Sufficiently Advanced
> > Technology.
SNIP:
S M Stirling has written something to rhis effect in his 'Dies the
Fire' sequence. . My 'willingness to believe' is unable to squelch my
skepticism. Removing electricity and magnetism was bad enough. There
goes the Earth's magnetic ****eld against solar radiation and what
happens to the biological electric signals? A flat EEG is a bad sign.
Worse was when he limited steam pressure to insignificant levels. Give-
me-a-break. No more geysers? No more Krakataos or Mt. St. Helens?  How
does it draw a line for the Gas Laws? Just how the heck is that
mysterious what-ever-it-is supposed to tell the difference between man-
made and natural effects? His work is fantasy and not science fiction.
Given that, it's a good adventure story, but . . . . my disbelief
prevailed.
My suggestion would be not radiation as the McGuffin but Von Neumann
nanos programmed to eat that advanced tech and reproduce and
disassemble such items and then, job done, quietly disassemble each
other an the last one starve to death. 'Sufficiently Advanced' does
need definition. Would Model T Fords be permitted? Hot tubs?
Walt BJ
Walt BJ
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
Atomic bug bomb!
Damien Valentine <vale  2008-01-26 12:13:31 
Re: Atomic bug bomb!
Robert Martinu <invali  2008-01-26 22:14:06 
Re: Atomic bug bomb!
Logan Kearsley <chrono  2008-01-26 15:03:25 
Re: Atomic bug bomb!
Aaron Bergman <abergma  2008-01-26 19:15:27 
Re: Atomic bug bomb!
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-01-26 18:01:53 
Re: Atomic bug bomb!
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-01-26 18:44:09 
Re: Atomic bug bomb!
WaltBJ <waltbj01@[EMAI  2008-01-26 15:53:33 
Re: Atomic bug bomb!
"Sheerluck" <  2008-01-27 12:16:44 
Re: Atomic bug bomb!
Bryan Derksen <bryan.d  2008-01-27 04:22:09 
Re: Atomic bug bomb!
bealoid <signup@[EMAIL  2008-01-27 14:18:27 
Re: Atomic bug bomb!
Damien Valentine <vale  2008-01-28 13:10:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Wed Jul 9 2:14:46 CDT 2008.