Fetters <juddfetters@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 7:53 pm, Damien Valentine <valen...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On the other hand, the OP's species is supposed to be "highly
> > advanced". That may imply the species evolved with males and females,
> > but for whatever reason, now depends on cloning, or some other
> > technological fix. (Such as Dan Goodman's example.)
> One of my core concerns with the premise is the assumption that humans
> would view alien homo***uality with the same vehemence as they do
> human homo***uality.
I think you mistake biology for culture. Everything suggests that Homo
sapiens is a bi***ual species as are our close relatives: Pan paniscus,
Pan troglodytes and Gorilla gorilla.
<http://www.stanford.edu/~lehmann/NVSavoLehmann.pdf>
Furthermore do remember the Greek and Roman views on same-gender ***.
--
Per Erik Rønne, MSc
Frederikssundsvej 308B, 3. tv.
DK-2700 Brønshøj, Denmark
Telephone + fax +45 38 89 00 16, mobile +45 28 23 09 92
http://www.RQNNE.dk
|
