Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: HistChan's ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 15 Topic 3338 of 3502
Post > Topic >>

Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications

by Luke Campbell <lwcamp@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 3, 2008 at 02:07 PM

On Feb 3, 11:18 am, Phillip Thorne <petho...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> If we were actually interested in building maintenance-free structures
> that last a long, long time, and cost was no object, what would we
> use?  Stainless steel?  Diamond slabs?

Carbon does react with oxygen, although this will be slow in the form
of bulk diamond crystals.  Still, alumia (aka corundum, sapphire,
ruby) could very well be preferred for this reason.

> Would it work to simply coat
> steel and concrete with impermeable diamond instead of paint?

Carbon dissolves into steel.  This indicates that diamond would not be
the preferred coating for steel - in time the coating would degrade
and the surface steel would weaken.

> As an
> unmatched thermal conductor, is diamond immune to destructive thermal
> stresses?  Would it be safe fom everything short of volcanic bombs and
> crowds with hammerS?

Bulk diamond crystal is brittle, and likely to have catastrophic
failure modes.  Some sort of nanocyrstalline material would likely
work better, since cracks will tend to stop at grain boundaries,
improving toughness.

Luke




 15 Posts in Topic:
HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
Phillip Thorne <pethor  2008-02-03 14:18:32 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-03 14:07:25 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
Johnny Tindalos <Jamai  2008-02-04 13:14:56 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
Phillip Thorne <pethor  2008-02-04 23:16:55 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
Johnny Tindalos <Jamai  2008-02-05 18:10:59 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
"Mike Combs" &l  2008-02-06 12:38:09 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
George W Harris <gharr  2008-02-07 00:42:13 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
Erik Max Francis <max@  2008-02-07 00:22:09 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-04 13:11:24 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
"Joetheone" <  2008-02-04 21:28:28 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
Brian Davis <brdavis@[  2008-02-05 04:34:09 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
"Joetheone" <  2008-02-05 16:05:20 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
Damien Valentine <vale  2008-02-07 18:06:08 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
Knobby <knobbynobbs@[E  2008-02-07 21:33:56 
Re: HistChan's "Life After People" and the SF implications
Johnny Tindalos <Jamai  2008-02-08 19:17:02 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Wed May 14 14:59:01 CDT 2008.