Re: Please jog my memory

ilya2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes:

> So the treaty is poorly phrased. In one sentence it specifies "at
> any place under [Treaty's signatory's] jurisdiction or control" and
> in the next sentence it says "including outer space". The only
> interpretation that makes sense is that if you can place a nuclear
> device at some location in outer space, than that location is by
> definition under your control.

I think that's a very good definition of "under control". :-)