Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science Fiction > Science > Re: Laser prote...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 14 of 18 Topic 3343 of 3639
Post > Topic >>

Re: Laser protection

by Luke Campbell <lwcamp@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 8, 2008 at 10:18 AM

On Feb 7, 11:01 pm, Mike Williams <nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> I can't find the equations for the dispersion of laser beams, but I
> would have thought that at a distance of 300km the beam would so wide
> that it wouldn't make an effective weapon even against black targets.

A 1 micron IR laser focused through a 10 meter lens will have an ideal
spot diameter of around 40 cm at 300 km (in practice, the spot will be
a bit larger, but not too much larger for high quality beams).  If the
laser has a 10 MW output, it will be delivering 800 kW per square
centimeter.  This is intense enough to propagate a melt front into
iron at a rate of around 10 cm/s.
http://panoptesv.com/SciFi/DamageAverage.html

> A laser is useless as a point defence weapon against unsilvered kinetic
> slugs. You take just as much damage from a kinetic slug that's been
> melted by a laser as from a solid slug.

If you destroy the guidance of the projectile, it is trivial to
maneuver out of the way.  Propellant tanks can be holed, chemical fuel/
propellant can be ignited, rocket motors can be damaged, and if the
projectile is under thrust even merely weakening the casing can cause
it to explode.  All of these let you easily avoid the incoming round.
At close ranges, you will also be able to va****ize parts of a solid
slug, breaking it apart into pieces small enough for your armor to
handle or using the reaction of the jet of hot plasma blasting off the
surface to deflect the kinetic.

Luke
 




 18 Posts in Topic:
Laser protection
MacFraggin@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-07 16:53:45 
Re: Laser protection
Jack Tingle <wjtingle@  2008-02-07 21:36:33 
Re: Laser protection
MacFraggin@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-07 19:51:24 
Re: Laser protection
Mike Williams <nospam@  2008-02-08 06:01:19 
Re: Laser protection
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-07 22:13:39 
Re: Laser protection
Remus Shepherd <remus@  2008-02-08 14:42:46 
Re: Laser protection
MacFraggin@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-08 03:31:33 
Re: Laser protection
MacFraggin@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-08 04:56:19 
Re: Laser protection
Mike Williams <nospam@  2008-02-08 14:05:05 
Re: Laser protection
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-08 07:00:29 
Re: Laser protection
IsaacKuo <mechdan@[EMA  2008-02-08 07:31:59 
Re: Laser protection
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-08 09:47:56 
Re: Laser protection
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-08 10:07:44 
Re: Laser protection
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-08 10:18:08 
Re: Laser protection
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-08 10:31:39 
Re: Laser protection
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-08 10:41:40 
Re: Laser protection
Luke Campbell <lwcamp@  2008-02-08 10:46:18 
Re: Laser protection
MacFraggin@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-02-09 00:42:49 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Thu Jul 24 16:16:47 CDT 2008.