Re: What would the end velocity be if...?

finite guy wrote:
> On Feb 22, 12:23 pm, Erik Max Francis <m...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> You were asking about particles at rest, which can't include photons,
so
>> I don't know what you're asking.
> 
> You mean that you don't know how to correctly include photons in your
> concept.

You asked about particles at rest, which can't be photons, so of course 
I didn't say anything about them.  I didn't mention fruit flies, either, 
because you didn't say anything about them.

"My concept" is describing basic special relativistic equations (or 
basic mechanics, if you read my simpler response about calculus) which 
are uncontroversial outside of crankdom.  Hmm, am I starting to think 
we've crossed over to the other side by someone crossposting to sci.math 
.... ?

> At delta time = zero, ALL things are static.
> That is mathematically and conceptually obvious...

Time flows, so that hardly matters.  If you freeze time, everything is 
static.  So what?

> What is your commonly held misconception?
> Perhaps it starts with thinking that the Pythagoras Theorem involves
> 'squares'.
> x^2 + y^2 = e^2 does not show Pythagoras 'Squares'.
> They are areas, as you point out...

I never said anything about the Pythagoras theorem and pointed no such 
thing out.  And I now see that this is a waste of time.

At first I thought you were just being difficult.  Then I thought you 
were just really, really confused and clueless, but sincere.  Now I see 
that you're just a sci.math-im****ted crank.

> Perhaps this is the beginning of the problem.
> Think so...?

Think I'm done.

-- 
Erik Max Francis && max@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
  San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis
   So take a look at yourself / What's this secret you can't tell me
    -- Level 42